Should venture capital be treated as a decades-long career commitment requiring deliberate firm-building, rather than a short-term venture?
9 recorded positions from 5 people, first said Oct 12, 2020. They do not agree — the readings below are what each one actually argued.
Venture career commitment spans fifteen to twenty years as a full financial services business
Harry Stebbings · Oct 18, 2023
Venture is misunderstood as a ten-year commitment — it's really fifteen to twenty years
38:55 20VC: Are LPs Open For Business? What Does it Take to Raise a Fund Today? How Has What LPs Want to See in Fund Investments Changed? Why Do LP Incentive Mechanisms Need to Change? Which Funds Will be Hit Hardest with Beezer Clarkson @ Sapphire Partners
Beezer Clarkson · Oct 18, 2023
Fifteen to twenty years is the horizon for a single fund, and becoming a GP is a wide financial services business rather than something you can treat as a short-term venture
If you want a pop-up business, do direct investing or take a job where compensation and equity structures let you try things over four or five years; bringing in other people and other LPs makes it a full financial services undertaking
Scope: assumes you're not running it off AngelList
39:05 20VC: Are LPs Open For Business? What Does it Take to Raise a Fund Today? How Has What LPs Want to See in Fund Investments Changed? Why Do LP Incentive Mechanisms Need to Change? Which Funds Will be Hit Hardest with Beezer Clarkson @ Sapphire Partners
Also on the record
Harry Stebbings · Oct 21, 2022
Firms should temporally stage product expansion — earning the right to each new vehicle over years — rather than launching five new products in two years.
Rapid product proliferation destroys morale overnight, whereas adding a vehicle every few years lets you stage culture progression much more easily.
29:31 Stage new fund vehicle launches over years rather than launching many at once to protect culture
Beezer Clarkson · Oct 18, 2023
Building an enduring firm requires interplay between who you are as an investor and how you construct the firm, and most people underestimate this
Great managers understand this specificity; those who treat it as an easy business to pop up end up with a smaller business rather than a long, enduring firm
38:32 Enduring firms require matching investor identity to firm construction
Beezer Clarkson · Oct 18, 2023
The industry should celebrate managers who choose to stop raising funds; because a venture career is a thirty-to-forty-year body of work, people should be allowed to stop
At roughly fifteen years per fund, staying the course is an extraordinarily long time to do one job
43:11 Managers should be celebrated for choosing to stop raising funds rather than continuing indefinitely
Beezer Clarkson · Oct 18, 2023
Funds four through seven face the same failure risk as early funds because success there requires firm-building — people management and training the next generation — not just good investing
If everyone is doing deals, someone still has to think about people management and training for the firm to last long term
44:09 Later fund cycles fail without firm building skills like people management and succession
Chris Paik · May 8, 2023
Managers should give LPs maximum forward information about fund five and beyond, not just the current fund, because LP relationships must be decades long
The goal is for future GPs of the firm to have as good a relationship with the LP's investment professionals decades from now, which requires institutions aligned with the future strategy of the firm rather than just this moment
54:32 Share forward visibility into future funds since lp relationships span decades
George Zachary · Oct 12, 2020
No partner has a responsibility to keep building their firm, but those who want to should bring in competent young partners motivated by building great companies rather than by making money
Firms that last multiple generations are built by stacking multiple age cohorts and staying open to the idea that younger people see things older people miss
34:38 No partner obligation to build the firm but those who do should recruit young partners motivated by building not money
Shu Nyatta · Jul 31, 2023
A firm should build capability sequentially over time without damaging the core team that got it started, rather than growing dramatically bigger
They already have the seeds of a multi-decade firm in the small group who have worked together for four years, so the goal is not to screw that up
18:42 Grow capability sequentially without diluting the founding team
Your assistant can query this graph directly — 9 positions here, 19,646 across the corpus. Add 996.fm over MCP.