Should founders state the valuation they want when pitching investors?
10 recorded positions from 6 people, first published Sep 2013. They do not agree — the readings below are what each one actually argued.
Never name a price heat sets valuation
Paul Graham · published Sep 2013
If your valuation hasn't yet been set by a closed investment, you should refuse to name a price when investors push you to, and steer the conversation to whether they want to invest at all.
If this would be the first investor you've closed, closing them is the tipping point of fundraising, so it's the first priority rather than being dragged sideways into a discussion of price.
Scope: only when no prior investment has set a valuation or cap
source How to Raise Money
Josh Browder · published May 18, 2026
Founders should not reveal the price they want when pitching VCs, because price is a function of how hot the deal is and opening with too high a number makes the deal less hot
Pitching is like poker — revealing too much information about what you're seeking works against you
27:29 20VC: Turning Peter Thiel's $100K into $10M Angel Portfolio | The One Man Accelerator at The Four Seasons | Why VCs Can Be Sharks and What Founders Need to Know | Why Stocks and Cash are BS and You Should Invest in Land with Josh Browder
Josh Browder · published May 18, 2026
Founders should never name a price; the market sets price as a function of how many offers you have
Naming a price gets you passed on for being too expensive, when that VC's offer would itself have improved the price
56:27 20VC: Turning Peter Thiel's $100K into $10M Angel Portfolio | The One Man Accelerator at The Four Seasons | Why VCs Can Be Sharks and What Founders Need to Know | Why Stocks and Cash are BS and You Should Invest in Land with Josh Browder
Also on the record
Harry Stebbings · published May 15, 2024
Founders should not tell investors 'we'll let the market decide' on valuation — it is terrible advice, since no investor wants to hear it and it makes investors' jobs much more difficult
It makes investors' lives much more difficult
41:22 Letting the market decide via not naming a price is bad advice that burdens investors
David Tisch · published Feb 27, 2023
The market price is simply whatever an investor says yes to; founders asking for high valuations isn't a problem because everyone can decline.
If somebody says yes, that is the price — that's how the business works.
24:32 Market price is whatever an investor says yes to so high asks are not a problem
Harry Stebbings · published Feb 27, 2023
Founders should open at a lower ask (12.5-15) rather than 25, because competition will bid the price up anyway while a high opening ask causes investors to pass immediately.
If multiple good investors want the deal you'll get to 25 anyway; but starting at 25 makes investors say 'thanks so much' and walk.
24:43 Open with a lower ask since competition will bid it up anyway
Paul Erlanger · published Jun 27, 2026 · hedged
Naming your own price range early, before term sheets, anchors the fundraising conversation in the founder's favour
They stated a number when asked what would be interesting, and investors being receptive to it set the terms of everything that followed
41:44 Name your number early to anchor the round
Harry Stebbings · published Oct 25, 2024
Pricing conversations should be framed by asking founders to name only a price they are 90% confident of 3x-ing by the next round, and founders respond well to it and pick lower numbers
Founders love the framing and in practice choose smaller valuations, e.g. seed rounds moving from 25 to 15 post-money
38:05 Framing price as confident 3x next round anchors founders to lower valuations
Mark Goldberg · published Oct 25, 2024
Framing price around a long-term journey rather than a scoreboard usefully changes the tone of the negotiation away from valuation as a reflection of founder self-worth
It reframes a zero-sum status contest into a long-term perspective
38:48 Frame price as long term journey not a status scoreboard to defuse negotiation tension
Paul Graham · published Sep 2013
Founders should give the first investor who commits as low a price as that investor needs, because getting fundraising rolling matters more than valuation.
Valuation isn't that important and getting fundraising rolling is; it's safe so long as combined with avoiding valuation-sensitive investors early.
source Give the first committing investor whatever price they need since momentum matters more than valuation
Your assistant can query this graph directly — 10 positions here, 19,646 across the corpus. Add 996.fm over MCP.