Skip to content

Debates

Are bridge rounds usually a bridge to nowhere, or can they rescue companies and produce strong returns?

5 recorded positions from 5 people, first said Aug 26, 2021. They do not agree — the readings below are what each one actually argued.

Bridge rounds are usually a bridge to nowhere

Frank Rotman · Aug 26, 2021

Most insider bridge rounds happen because the company has just generated anti-proof, making it the wrong moment to raise from a new investor

New capital is hard to attract right after surfacing evidence that something didn't work, so the company must first earn its way out of that anti-evidence before it can tell a 'back on track' story

Scope: not universally true; excludes preemptive insider rounds where the company is doing extraordinarily well or the investors want to avoid data leakage

25:51 20VC: Has Price Discipline Disappeared? Is it Possible to Build Ownership Over Time? Why Venture Is Less Collaborative Now Than Ever? How fast Do Breakout Companies Become Obvious? How To Construct an Optimised and Repeatable Investment Decision-Making Pr

Jason Lemkin · May 27, 2024 · hedged

Pouring large amounts of money via safes or debt into a struggling company almost never works and those companies should be written off

He can't point to any cloud leader that had 18–24 months of 8% growth, took another $60M in safes, turned it around and made investors money

Scope: distinguishes this from a genuine small bridge round, which he needed himself as a founder

40:18 20VC: Why Seed is Systemically Broken | Why Pricing is Worse Than Ever and There is More Funding Than Ever | Benchmarks for Churn, Retention and Growth Rates - Good vs Great | Why Last Vintage for Private Equity Will Suck with Jason Lemkin

Harry Stebbings · Mar 10, 2025

99% of bridge rounds are a bridge to nowhere

73:14 20VC: Lessons from Investing $2BN and Returning $8BN in Cash | Why Most Venture Partnerships are Broken | We Sold Salesforce Early and Lost Out on Billions | Are The Best Deals Always Expensive and Competitive with Jake Saper @ Emergence Capital

Bridge rounds can rescue companies and return strong gains

Mamoon Hamid · Oct 21, 2024

Companies a week from running out of cash can still become public companies, so participating in distressed bridges is worth it

Box required three bridge rounds in 2008-09 because the market was dead and nobody wanted to fund a cloud storage business they assumed Google or Microsoft would eat alive

24:04 20VC: Kleiner Perkins' Mamoon Hamid on Investing Lessons from Leading Rounds in Figma, Slack and Rippling | Lessons Building a Generational Defining Firm with Kleiner Perkins | AI: Where Value Accrues, Startups vs Incumbents & Scaling Laws

Jake Saper · Mar 10, 2025 · hedged

Bridge rounds are not always a bridge to nowhere — some rescue companies and generate large returns on favourable terms

Intacct grew slowly and hit cash problems; Emergence bridged it on favourable terms, the company then found an accounting-firm channel motion, took off and was bought by Sage for around a billion dollars

Scope: acknowledges this is a cherry-picked example

73:22 20VC: Lessons from Investing $2BN and Returning $8BN in Cash | Why Most Venture Partnerships are Broken | We Sold Salesforce Early and Lost Out on Billions | Are The Best Deals Always Expensive and Competitive with Jake Saper @ Emergence Capital

Your assistant can query this graph directly — 5 positions here, 19,646 across the corpus. Add 996.fm over MCP.