Do large organizations' priorities and hiring decisions serve internal politics and status rather than customers or products?
6 recorded positions from 3 people, first said Jan 27, 2023. They do not agree — the readings below are what each one actually argued.
Also on the record
Edwin Chen · Jul 21, 2025
At large companies, priorities get set to impress managers and feed internal company machinery rather than because they help the end customer or product
Chains of justification bottom out in internal needs — improving a tool to make people 5% more productive because they spend 20% of their time interviewing because the org is growing for growth's sake — leaving priorities divorced from the customer; being small instead gives everyone direct visibility into customer problems
5:56 Priorities serve internal machinery and manager approval not customers
Edwin Chen · Jul 21, 2025
Outsiders don't realize how much work inside prestigious large companies exists purely to perpetuate and grow internal company machinery
Many people in those organizations aim not to build a product but to be able to say they run a thousand-person org, so their work becomes growing headcount and proving that org efficient to their VP or CEO
7:13 Employees grow headcount to claim running large orgs rather than build product
Edwin Chen · Jul 21, 2025 · hedged
You can distinguish doers from empire-builders in hiring by the questions candidates ask — product and user-flow questions versus questions about becoming a manager and hiring headcount
The questions at the forefront of someone's mind reveal what they actually care about
8:19 Interview questions about product vs management reveal doer vs empire builder
Edwin Chen · Jul 21, 2025
Many roles companies hire for aren't actually important, and there is a negative incentive to hire for hiring's sake because low headcount growth is read by others as the company doing badly
If someone says their engineering org grew 2% this year, the instinctive reaction is that they must not be doing well — a negative incentive to hire for hiring's sake
31:11 Low headcount growth is misread as failure creating incentive to overhire
Cliff Obrecht · Jan 27, 2023
Founders commonly focus too much on the art of running a company and not enough on the art of creating value, losing sight of why the business exists
As businesses grow, leaders get caught up in internal politics and the next big hire, but all a customer ever sees is the digital product — if that product isn't delightful, the business will fail
44:45 Founders neglect value creation for internal politics and the art of running the company
Jean-Denis Greze · Jul 21, 2023
At a large company, the best thing to work on is something that has real business impact but that leadership doesn't care about
Impact is the North Star, and impact is hard to achieve because politics and internal incentives get in the way; correspondingly, leaders should ask what it says about them if the best things for the business are happening where they're not looking
45:45 The best work at a large company often has real impact but goes unrecognized by leadership due to internal politics
Your assistant can query this graph directly — 6 positions here, 19,646 across the corpus. Add 996.fm over MCP.