What do institutional LPs actually want from a venture manager: maximum returns or a strategy that fits their portfolio?
5 recorded positions from 4 people, first said Nov 21, 2022. They do not agree — the readings below are what each one actually argued.
Lps want portfolio fit not return maximization
Semil Shah · Nov 21, 2022
Bucketed allocation makes sense from the LP's own vantage point even if it looks irrational to insiders
Most LPs don't live in the Bay Area or the market, aren't talking to founders and VCs constantly, and have to present a strategy or map of the coverage they want
46:26 20VC: Semil Shah on The Biggest Mistakes VCs and LPs Made Over the Last 24 Months, Why LP Churn is Coming, Core Lessons on Scaling from $1M Haystack Fund I to Today and How To Find, Win and Manage LPs as an Emerging Manager
Max Altman · Nov 21, 2025
The biggest surprise of fundraising was that LPs don't want to hear how much money you'll make them; they want a strategy that fits exactly what their portfolio needs
Despite the GP's job being to return the most capital, institutional LPs are allocating to fill a portfolio slot
43:05 20VC: Max Altman on The New Seed War: Can Anyone Compete with Sequoia and a16z | Leaving $2BN on the Table with Reddit | Lessons from Backing Rippling at $25M Post | Why Climate Tech is a Mirage and Disaster
Also on the record
Harry Stebbings · Nov 21, 2022
Rigid bucket allocation gives LPs adverse selection; they should simply allocate to the best managers they see
If the mandate is 'we need a Series A fund in New York', they pick whichever such fund happens to be raising that quarter, and it's often bad
44:35 Rigid bucket mandates produce adverse selection lps should back the best manager regardless of category
Oren Zeev · Feb 2, 2026
A GP should not pass on a compelling company just to smooth deployment pace for LPs; LPs who dislike the inconsistency can opt out
He invests fast because he sees opportunities he wants, not for speed's sake; he won't change his approach for LP planning convenience
27:05 Gp should optimize opportunity and let misfit lps opt out
Max Altman · Nov 21, 2025
LP types require completely different pitches: family offices and funds of funds should be told how much money they'll make, while endowments and foundations want a strategy and story that fits their portfolio
Their incentives differ — fund-of-funds staff are paid on upside, while endowments and foundations mainly want brand safety and a good relationship and are indifferent between a 2x and 7x fund
42:10 Lp type decides returns pitch versus portfolio fit pitch
Your assistant can query this graph directly — 5 positions here, 19,646 across the corpus. Add 996.fm over MCP.