What framework should investors use to assess and price risk in a startup investment?
9 recorded positions from 4 people, first said May 24, 2021. They do not agree — the readings below are what each one actually argued.
Venture bets on the most credible theory then finances the company to convert it into data
Frank Rotman · Aug 26, 2021
The best businesses to back are ones where risk can be systematically de-risked — broken into smaller provable theses that can be tested cheaply in market
You can turn over cards, let the market tell you where you're right or wrong, and then put money behind what's working
Scope: not every venture-backable business fits this; it's QED's sweet spot
11:20 20VC: Has Price Discipline Disappeared? Is it Possible to Build Ownership Over Time? Why Venture Is Less Collaborative Now Than Ever? How fast Do Breakout Companies Become Obvious? How To Construct an Optimised and Repeatable Investment Decision-Making Pr
Will Quist · Sep 12, 2022
The job of the venture asset class, including new venture, is to bet on theories: enter where you have more conviction in a highly credible theory on at least one lever than others do, and finance the company to run the experiment
Converting hypotheses into first-party data produces the biggest change in the discount rate applied to enterprise value
17:16 20VC: Why 95% of Venture Capital is Not Really "Venture Capital" | The Five Core Levers Needed To Assess Risk and Price a Startup | The Future of Venture; Who Wins, Who Loses, What Happens to the Crossover Funds with Will Quist, Partner @ Slow Ventures
Any single lever can kill the deal making pricing irreducible to one formula
Nigel Morris · May 24, 2021
Startup outcomes are capriciously hard to predict because each individual risk is solvable on its own but they must all line up as conditional probabilities — the 'point nine to the power six' problem
Team building, TAM, compliance, regulation, funding, getting the A round done are each individually solvable, but the compounded conditional probability of all of them going right is low
Scope: applies particularly at the early stage
11:12 20VC: Why Bundling Does Not Work, How The Best Founders Analyse Unit Economics, Why The Way We Approach Mental Health in Venture and Startups is Wrong with Nigel Morris, Co-Founder & Managing Partner @ QED Investors
Will Quist · Sep 12, 2022
Any single one of the five levers can produce an answer that kills the whole investment, which is why venture is simple but complex and has no pithy one-word answer
18:16 20VC: Why 95% of Venture Capital is Not Really "Venture Capital" | The Five Core Levers Needed To Assess Risk and Price a Startup | The Future of Venture; Who Wins, Who Loses, What Happens to the Crossover Funds with Will Quist, Partner @ Slow Ventures
Also on the record
Will Quist · Sep 12, 2022
Venture is simple but hard: the mental formula for pricing risk is simple, but weighing the contextual levers of any given experiment is the hard part
You must trade off factors like a strong value prop against a small market against a founder with no background in the space, and the weighting is almost always contextual, requiring art, science and discipline
8:56 Pricing formula is simple but weighing contextual levers is the hard part
Will Quist · Sep 12, 2022
Pricing any company comes down to five levers: whether the arc of history bends the company's way, the product's absolute and relative value proposition, the market, defensibility, and the business model's equity efficiency
These are the questions at the root of what value investors, buyout firms and top VCs implicitly or explicitly ask when deciding how to price a deal
14:52 Price via five core levers history product value market defensibility and business model efficiency
Will Quist · Sep 12, 2022 · hedged
A root cause of many startup failures is a product whose value proposition is merely qualitative rather than easily identifiable and quantifiably worth more than its price, which makes it hard to sell — though black swans and macro/political shocks can also cause failure
The point of investing is backing someone who manufactures value in excess of what it costs to produce; when that gap is quantifiable and causal, the product sells itself with no sales and marketing cost
18:32 Qualitative non quantifiable value propositions explain many startup failures though black swans also cause failure
Harry Stebbings · Sep 12, 2022
Product value proposition is not all that matters — macro and political factors like a LatAm currency devaluation or a change in political regime can make a business completely unsustainable
18:48 Macro and political shocks not just product value proposition can doom a business
Will Quist · Sep 12, 2022
Risk should be assessed by counting how many of the five levers rest on theory rather than first- or third-party data; beyond a certain number of stacked theoreticals the deal cannot be priced and is NPV negative
Having one correct novel theory in your life is already a low-odds proposition, and the odds of being right on two vectors are exponentially rather than linearly lower
20:22 Count theoretical vs data backed levers too many stacked theoreticals makes a deal unpriceable
Your assistant can query this graph directly — 9 positions here, 19,646 across the corpus. Add 996.fm over MCP.