What size should a decision-making group be to remain effective?
6 recorded positions from 5 people, first said Aug 3, 2020. They do not agree — the readings below are what each one actually argued.
Four to six people is optimal across contexts including venture partnerships
Steve Jurvetson · Aug 3, 2020
Venture partnership team size should be two to five partners, seven is the absolute limit, and beyond seven partners IRRs and returns will plummet
One of the biggest lessons of his twenty-five years of process learning; team size matters the same way for development teams inside companies and for boards
46:05 20VC: Steve Jurvetson on 20 Years of Friendship with Elon Musk, How To Analyse Market Timing, Why Venture Does Not Scale & Why He Has Never Sold A Share in Any Company He Holds
Jordan Van Horn · Aug 17, 2022
Hiring by large-group consensus is a symptom of not having conviction about the role, and always goes wrong — keep the decision-making group under six
Bringing 15 people into the process to find the best person by consensus substitutes for getting clear on what the organization actually needs
Scope: decision group should be fewer than six people
31:22 20 Sales: Three Reasons Why Sales People Fail | The Two Things That Matter When Hiring Sales Leaders | Why Revenue, Discounting and Price Do Not Matter in the Early Days with Jordan Van Horn, Revenue Leader @ Monte Carlo
Harry Stebbings · Nov 1, 2023 · hedged
Four to six people is the group size where you get optimal decision making
The same dynamic holds in venture partnerships
40:02 20Product: Why You Should Not Go Into Product Management, Why the CEO is Always the CPO, How to Build the Best Product Teams & Why You Should Hire People Who Aren't In Product Already with Databricks SVP Product, David Meyer
Four to ten people is optimal larger becomes empty ceremony
Wesley Chan · Aug 22, 2022
Whether a board adds value depends on its size: small boards produce substantive discussion while boards of ten to twenty people add little and cost the founder management time
Canva's four-person board has real discussions about hundred-year plans, whereas on large boards everyone has a different opinion and he'd rather not be there
26:02 20VC: Why Market Always Wins Over the Founder & Why I Do Not Do Market Sizing | Why it is not the Best Time to be Investing but it is the Best Time to Have a Fund & The Type of Deals to do Today | Why The Best Founders Have 100 Year Plans with Wes Chan, C
David Meyer · Nov 1, 2023 · hedged
Product review quality degrades with headcount in the room — fewer than ten, probably more than four, and at twenty it becomes an empty ceremony
More people means wasteful cycles on things like button placement and conflicting opinions; in bigger companies everyone in the management chain feels entitled to attend, which turns the review into ritual
Scope: founders are worth including early despite the risk because of the context they bring
39:13 20Product: Why You Should Not Go Into Product Management, Why the CEO is Always the CPO, How to Build the Best Product Teams & Why You Should Hire People Who Aren't In Product Already with Databricks SVP Product, David Meyer
Also on the record
David Meyer · Nov 1, 2023
Adding people to a room dilutes the clarity and intensity of what gets said and makes communication actively damaging rather than merely slower
You self-censor — dropping glibness and curse words — and polite phrasing takes ten seconds where blunt phrasing takes four; with ten people, listeners interpret things differently and then report the news wrong to others, whereas people who work together share a lexicon and can be high bandwidth
40:21 Additional people dilute directness and cause self censorship
Your assistant can query this graph directly — 6 positions here, 19,646 across the corpus. Add 996.fm over MCP.