Are frontier AI lab valuations too high, or is there much more upside from here?
26 recorded positions from 17 people, first said May 3, 2023. They do not agree — the readings below are what each one actually argued.
Much more upside keep buying frontier rounds
Vince Hankes · May 3, 2023
It is better to bet on the compounding upside of OpenAI's scalability than to sit on the sidelines, because once the outcome is clear the company will get priced up very quickly
The scalability properties of what OpenAI has built are so good that waiting for clarity means paying far more
32:42 20VC: The OpenAI Memo: Why Invest? Is it too Late to Catch OpenAI? Are OpenAI's Models Truly Defensible? Does the Value in AI Accrue to Incumbemts or Startups - Application Layer/Infrastructure? What Happens with Regulation? with Vince Hankes @ Thrive
Zachary Bookman · Dec 6, 2024
Investing in OpenAI at $150BN is a nice bet: roughly 60% chance it becomes a world-changing trillion dollar company, 20% chance it goes sideways and you recover most of your money via the pref stack, 20% chance of a total loss
The upside case dominates the distribution of outcomes even with a real chance of zero
Scope: Meeker said she is not in the round; Bookman doesn't remember the numbers exactly
55:31 20VC: From Unsexy Startup to $1.8BN Acquisition | Why VCs and Founders are Fundamentally Misaligned | Why Valuations and Fundraising are BS | Lessons from Josh Kushner and Marc Andreesen | Zac Bookman, OpenGov
Tom Hulme · Apr 10, 2025
Buying OpenAI at a $300B valuation is a reasonable investment
As a consumer business it has extraordinary momentum and is only now building moats — switching costs via memory, and generational brand capture where ChatGPT is synonymous with LLMs — while at a $12B run rate roughly 20x forward with downside somewhat protected
Scope: doesn't believe it's the best Gen AI investment available; assumes downside is somewhat protected
74:48 20VC: How to Fix the UK Tech Ecosystem | Why We Need to Flood the UK with Venture Capital | What the UK Can Learn From Sequoia, Stripe and Norway | Why Now is the Time to be Bullish on China & Lessons from Jensen Huang with Tom Hulme & Stan Boland
Harry Stebbings · Apr 10, 2025
He would buy OpenAI at its current valuation
He likes businesses everyone thinks are topping out when they are actually reaching escape velocity, and the introduction of moats and memory is important
76:20 20VC: How to Fix the UK Tech Ecosystem | Why We Need to Flood the UK with Venture Capital | What the UK Can Learn From Sequoia, Stripe and Norway | Why Now is the Time to be Bullish on China & Lessons from Jensen Huang with Tom Hulme & Stan Boland
Victor Lazarte · Apr 14, 2025 · hedged
On average, buying today's winners will work out
Implied by the scale of value being created in the current AI cycle
Scope: on average
0:00 20VC: Benchmark's Victor Lazarte on Why Portfolio Construction is BS| Why SaaS Spreadsheet Investing is Dead | Why China is a Stabilising Force for the US | Three Traits All the Best Founders Have & The Lie All Big Tech Companies Have Been Telling
Victor Lazarte · Apr 14, 2025
Buying the winners at today's AI prices will work out on average
AI companies are attacking a ~$10T labor spend rather than the ~$1T software spend, so outcomes will be far larger than before, and the set of early winners is small
Scope: on average across a basket of winners; some individual winners will look overpriced in retrospect
33:26 20VC: Benchmark's Victor Lazarte on Why Portfolio Construction is BS| Why SaaS Spreadsheet Investing is Dead | Why China is a Stabilising Force for the US | Three Traits All the Best Founders Have & The Lie All Big Tech Companies Have Been Telling
Harry Stebbings · May 5, 2025
OpenAI will unwaveringly become a $2 trillion company, reversing his doubt of a year ago about its long-term sustainability and enterprise value
49:28 20VC Exclusive: Why Mega Platforms Will Win in VC | Why You Cannot Do VC If You Do Not Do Pre-Seed | Why Market Sizing is BS | Where Will Foundation Models Build/Buy Apps vs Where Will They Not with Bucky Moore
Hemant Taneja · Sep 22, 2025
Anthropic could be 10-20x bigger from here and is well priced even at its current valuation.
The market is effectively endless — roughly $500BN of developer payroll and perhaps $10TN of white collar work — and Anthropic is naturally positioned as one of only two or three players to capture it.
Scope: conditional on the business staying on trajectory; growth investing still requires focus on economics, margins and profitability
34:21 20VC: General Catalyst CEO Hemant Taneja on The Future of Venture Capital: Chanel vs Walmart | Lessons Scaling GC to $40BN in AUM | Investing $5BN+ Into Stripe Over 14 Rounds | Investing Hundreds of Millions into Anthropic at $60BN Valuation
Jonathan Ross · Sep 29, 2025
Both OpenAI at $500B and Anthropic at $180B are highly undervalued
Framing them as competing for a finite market is wrong — their R&D increases the size of the market itself
59:55 20VC: OpenAI and Anthropic Will Build Their Own Chips | NVIDIA Will Be Worth $10TRN | How to Solve the Energy Required for AI... Nuclear | Why China is Behind the US in the Race for AGI with Jonathan Ross, Groq Founder
Harry Stebbings · Oct 17, 2025
OpenAI will be worth over $3 trillion within five years.
Scope: over/under game framing
43:01 20VC: The Startup Adding $1M ARR Every Week | Competing Against OpenAI's Codex and Claude Code: Who Wins | Why Gemini is Failing and GPT-5 Is Winning | Do Margins Matter in a World of AI | The Ugly Truth About AI Coding with Zach Lloyd, Warp
Everett Randle · Nov 10, 2025 · hedged
OpenAI could raise at a trillion-dollar valuation with no problem by the end of this year or Q2
Scope: timing given as end of year or Q2
16:52 20VC: Benchmark's Newest General Partner Ev Randle on Why Margins Matter Less in AI | Why Mega Funds Will Not Produce Good Returns | OpenAI vs Anthropic: What Happens and Who Wins Coding | Investing Lessons from Peter Thiel and Mamoon Hamid
Winston Weinberg · Jan 19, 2026
Both Anthropic and OpenAI are worth buying at double their current valuations ($350B and $800B)
25:06 20VC: How Model Performance is Plateauing | Two Key Rules for Effective Deal-Making | Company Building Lessons from Keith Rabois, Brian Halligan and Pat Grady | Why Enterprise AI Adoption is Years Off with Harvey CEO Winston Weinberg
Aaron Levie · Apr 20, 2026 · hedged
Investors should still be loading up on frontier lab rounds because valuations could go much higher from here
The numbers could continue to get much larger
Scope: framed as what he 'would probably' do
0:00 20VC: Everyone is Wrong; We Will Have More Developers in Five Years | Why Frontier Labs Will Be Way More Valuable Than They Are Today | Are SaaS Companies Cooked: Which Thrive & Which Die with Aaron Levie, Founder at Box
Aaron Levie · Apr 20, 2026 · hedged
As a venture investor today he would load up on frontier lab rounds because the valuations could get much larger
46:38 20VC: Everyone is Wrong; We Will Have More Developers in Five Years | Why Frontier Labs Will Be Way More Valuable Than They Are Today | Are SaaS Companies Cooked: Which Thrive & Which Die with Aaron Levie, Founder at Box
Brendan Foody · Jun 1, 2026 · speculative
At least one of OpenAI or Anthropic will be worth more than $10 trillion
The opportunity of holding the frontier model is so large it eats much of the economy's other demand, and the frontier model can be used as a teacher model to distill the best small models
Scope: framed as a guess
50:41 20VC: Mercor CEO on Why Application Layer Companies Have No Defensibility, The Model is the Product | Token Spend Will Exceed Headcount Spend in 5 Years | The True Cost of Hiring AI Researchers in the Valley Today with Brendan Foody
Perpetual leapfrogging while open source commoditizes behind you is unsustainable
Harry Stebbings · Jun 8, 2026
Frontier labs valued around a trillion dollars are priced to perfection, and perpetually leapfrogging to new problems while open source eats the value behind them is a hard business to sustain
You have to keep finding new valuable problems continuously as your prior value gets commoditized
9:55 20VC: Nebius Co-Founder on AI Infrastructure Bubbles | The Real Impact of Open Source on OpenAI & Anthropic | How Price Elastic is Demand for Compute | Could Nebius Sell 10x More Compute If They Had It & more with Roman Chernin
Arvind Jain · Jul 11, 2026 · hedged
The standalone model business is probably far less lucrative than people believe
Fierce competition even among a three-way race of closed labs creates pricing pressure, and open source is an order of magnitude cheaper; the labs' value now comes from being more than model companies
Scope: labs are no longer only model companies
16:22 20VC: Why OpenAI and Anthropic Won't Win the App Layer | Why Teams Will Get Bigger Not Smaller in a World of AI | Why AI Removes Incumbents Advantage of Bundling | China vs America: Who Wins the AI War with Arvind Jain, Co-Founder @ Glean
Also on the record
Hemant Taneja · Sep 22, 2025
The $60BN Anthropic round was the right round to do risk-adjusted, because it was the first moment these model companies looked like real businesses rather than bets on an abstract AGI goal.
The coding use case that would draw in enterprises and build durable relationships became clear and demonstrably scalable — and it has since scaled.
32:05 Coding use case proof made the 60bn anthropic round justified
Hemant Taneja · Sep 22, 2025
The recent Anthropic round was the cheapest and best-priced round he did all year on a multiples basis — roughly 20x ARR when comparable companies raise at 50-100x ARR at a tenth of the scale.
Relative multiples at far greater scale made it the best price available in that cohort, which is why it was five times oversubscribed.
33:36 Anthropic round priced cheap relative to peers on arr multiple
Hemant Taneja · Sep 22, 2025 · speculative
If Anthropic hits roughly $27B of ARR next year, public-market comps for that growth rate imply it should be worth around $500B by the end of next year
Growing from ~$9B to ~$27B is 200% growth, and the current round prices it at only 20x this year's ARR; applying the same multiple to next year's revenue, with a market large enough to sustain growth beyond that, gets you there
39:45 Public market comps imply 500bn valuation if arr hits 27bn next year
Matt Clifford · Jul 1, 2024 · hedged
He would probably not be a buyer of OpenAI at its current valuation, though if its revenue and productization continue, the valuation may not be unreasonable.
Within the next year there will be much more evidence about whether anyone actually has another good idea, and that is what the value depends on
15:16 Cautious on openai valuation pending evidence of differentiated ideas
Harry Stebbings · Jul 1, 2024
He would not buy OpenAI at $90B because its growth will plateau as competitors build comparable go-to-market capability
OpenAI scaled to $3.5B on the premise of being the best and having superior go-to-market, and both advantages are eroding as others build out GTM teams
15:40 Openai growth plateaus as competitors match its go to market capability
Stan Boland · Apr 10, 2025 · hedged
He would put money elsewhere than OpenAI because the API/agent interface, not the consumer chat interface, is likely to be the winning interface for foundation models
Most demand will come through APIs called by application software and agents, driven by latency and model performance, and rival models like Claude are as good or better than OpenAI's
75:39 Api agent interface not consumer chat will be the winning interface so prefer alternatives to openai
Mitchell Green · Mar 7, 2026
Underwriting entries at $100B+ valuations is extremely hard because at steady state companies trade at ~10x earnings, so a double implies ~$250B and ~$25B of earnings, which very few companies will ever produce
Steady-state multiples revert to roughly 10x earnings and dilution raises the bar further
52:27 Steady state earnings math makes entries above 100b unworkable
Bret Taylor · Oct 2, 2024 · hedged
Valuations for companies pursuing artificial general intelligence might not be irrational, even if they aren't entirely rational either
It is very hard to value a company that would create AGI — the value in a superintelligence or general intelligence platform is so large the numbers may be justified, though the technology already has substantial value in current form
8:48 Agi valuations may not be irrational given superintelligence scale upside
Richard Socher · Apr 18, 2025
He would not invest in OpenAI at $300B, Anthropic at $60B or Grok at $50B because he doesn't see 1000x outcomes from them, unlike early stage
He loves investing where 1000x returns are possible, and those valuations foreclose that
54:40 No thousand x outcome possible at these valuations so avoid frontier lab rounds
Your assistant can query this graph directly — 26 positions here, 19,646 across the corpus. Add 996.fm over MCP.