When a well-funded startup overspends and runs out of money, who bears more responsibility — the investors who enabled it, or the founders who spent it?
6 recorded positions from 4 people, first said Aug 23, 2023. They do not agree — the readings below are what each one actually argued.
Founders job is simply not to run out of money regardless of how much was raised
Jason Lemkin · Aug 23, 2023
Multi-stage funds writing large early checks is not a new phenomenon and does not excuse founders — the founder's job is simply not to run out of money
The seed critiques are all true (a 5-on-25 makes the next round hard, mega funds treat you as an option), but if you raise $8M instead of $2M the answer is not to spend it all
Scope: concedes the structural critiques of multi-stage seed rounds are accurate
8:04 20VC: NEW FORMAT: Mega Funds Will Come Back, Why Markups Have Corrupted VC, Why RIFs Should Always Be An Embarrassment To SaaS Founders and Why Pitching is BS and Fake with Jason Lemkin and Rick Zullo
Des Traynor · Nov 15, 2023
Blaming venture capital for over-hiring is wrong; the responsibility sits with the founder, who doesn't have to take the money, spend it, spend it on hiring, or spend it wastefully.
67:04 20VC: How to Survive and Thrive in a World of OpenAI, Are LLMs Being Commoditised, Where Does the Value Lie; Infrastructure or Application Layer, How Apple Could Win in a World of AI, How Amazon Could Threaten OpenAI and Why Google Struggle with Des Trayn
Also on the record
Harry Stebbings · Aug 23, 2023
Founders should take the large early round and operate as if they only raised 20% of it, but in practice no founder ever does this
8:54 Operate as if you raised a fraction of the round though no founder actually does this
Harry Stebbings · Aug 23, 2023
Founders run out of money because extra capital lets them hire more engineers, expand product, scale sales and test multiple marketing strategies and regions at once — and they choose to do all of it
Abundant capital creates more things you can do simultaneously, and founders take all of them
9:22 Abundant capital enables simultaneous initiatives founders cannot resist pursuing all of them
Rick Zullo · Aug 23, 2023
Investors are primarily responsible for the overspending problem, having steered founders toward growth over return on equity on the assumption capital would always be there
Capital was assumed abundant, founders watched peers doing the same thing, and VCs reinforced it; the last four or five years produced a ludicrous amount of stupid behavior
9:44 Investors are primarily responsible for steering founders toward overspending
Jason Lemkin · Aug 23, 2023
VCs are marginally more to blame than founders for the excess — 51/49 — but there is still no excuse for a founder running out of money
It's the founder's life and their company; if the business was declining eighteen months ago they should have seen it and adjusted, and 'don't run out of money' is the oldest rule in venture
10:18 Blame splits roughly 51 49 vcs slightly more but founders still must not run out of money
Your assistant can query this graph directly — 6 positions here, 19,646 across the corpus. Add 996.fm over MCP.