How much should investors weigh the quality of a founder's non-CEO cofounders?
10 recorded positions from 6 people, first said May 6, 2022. They do not agree — the readings below are what each one actually argued.
Weak cofounder is gone in three years so ignore them
Harry Stebbings · Mar 28, 2026 · hedged
Investors should evaluate a founding team by its spikiest member, usually the CEO, because the other co-founders often leave or get outgrown
The best founding teams frequently break up anyway — the CTO may fall away, leave, or be outgrown as head of engineering
Scope: framed as a provocation to test whether the founding relationship matters
45:40 20VC: The Venture Model is Broken | You Need to be Greedy and Selfish to Win Early Stage Investing | Why Margins Do Not Matter for Early-Stage Startups | The Growth Rate that is Required in a World of AI with Gili Raanan, Founder @ Cyberstarts
Harry Stebbings · Aug 8, 2026
One of the biggest mistakes investors make is turning down a company because they don't rate the non-CEO cofounder, since that cofounder usually isn't there in three years anyway.
The weaker cofounder is most often gone within three years, so the objection prices in a person who won't be around
13:34 20VC: The AI Boom Will Create Enormous Roadkill: Who Wins & Loses | Why Founders Should Never Take Multi-Stage Money at Seed | Why Triple, Triple, Double, Double is Good Enough
Shared history under stress predicts cofounder durability
Severin Hacker · May 19, 2025
The single best predictor of two founders avoiding founder conflict is whether they worked together before starting the company — friendship is not a substitute
You can know someone a long time yet they may be very different at work; he and Luis had worked together on research for two years before Duolingo
47:40 20VC: Duolingo Co-Founder on Why $3M is Harder than $100M to Raise | Why You Should Always Take Tier 1 VCs Even at Worse Terms | Why Europe Can't Win Unless the US Screws Up | How AI Impacts the Future of Work and Education with Severin Hacker
Gili Raanan · Mar 28, 2026
The durability of a founding relationship can be tested with simple questions about shared history — whether the founders were roommates, worked together, or went through challenges together
Prior shared experience under stress is evidence the relationship will hold
Scope: concedes that sometimes you simply cannot know
46:05 20VC: The Venture Model is Broken | You Need to be Greedy and Selfish to Win Early Stage Investing | Why Margins Do Not Matter for Early-Stage Startups | The Growth Rate that is Required in a World of AI with Gili Raanan, Founder @ Cyberstarts
Also on the record
Jason Lemkin · May 27, 2024
When investing in a company with 10 or fewer employees, only the CEO and CTO matter — the quality of the one salesperson or marketer is irrelevant
At that stage there is no real management team to evaluate; he only changed to this view after learning to interview whole exec teams at later stages
15:00 At ten employees or fewer only ceo and cto quality matters
Jason Lemkin · May 6, 2022
An A-plus CEO paired with an A-plus CTO plus any traction at all is a combination on which you essentially cannot lose money
A CTO who ships five times faster than a merely good one gives the pair jaw-dropping iteration speed — even a botched quarter is fixed by next quarter's software; he cites Owner adding a marketing automation layer that produced $200k of revenue in its first month
49:39 An a plus ceo paired with an a plus cto plus traction is a near unbeatable investment
Trae Stephens · Apr 3, 2024
The most common way he misjudges founders is getting excited about one person's superpower when they fail to build a complete, skill-diverse founding and executive team
Brilliant individuals assume their specific superpower is enough; if they lack a strength like recruiting, the incompleteness of the team becomes hugely problematic for the business
38:04 Over indexing on one founders superpower while missing team completeness is a common misjudgment
Trae Stephens · Apr 3, 2024
Hard tech companies need someone on the founding team who is as good at business as the technical founder is at the technology, and investors must evaluate both sides.
Ten years at Founders Fund show the most successful hard tech companies are always paired with brilliant business people.
56:50 Hard tech needs a business equal to the technical founder
David Frankel · Aug 8, 2026
He will rarely invest when he thinks the CEO is amazing but a cofounder isn't up to scratch.
13:34 Weak cofounder is disqualifying even with a great ceo
David Frankel · Aug 8, 2026
The ideal early-stage founding pair is a CTO who is a technical magician and a CEO who is a strong salesperson, and of the two the CEO's entrepreneurial ability matters more because the CTO role is more fungible.
The CTO role can be replaced or reshaped depending on technical complexity, while the CEO's selling and entrepreneurial capacity cannot.
14:01 Ceo entrepreneurial ability outweighs the more fungible cto
Your assistant can query this graph directly — 10 positions here, 19,646 across the corpus. Add 996.fm over MCP.