Skip to content

Debates

Is funding today's AI application startups logically consistent with believing AGI is imminent?

4 recorded positions from 3 people, first said Jul 31, 2024. The readings below are distinctions drawn on the record, not opposing camps.

Startups implicitly bet against agi since none would survive it

Ethan Mollick · Jul 31, 2024

There is an inconsistency in AI venture investing: every startup is effectively betting against AGI while their funders claim AGI is five years away, since none of those startups would survive an AGI world

If AGI genuinely arrived within five years, the companies being funded today would not survive it, so funding them contradicts believing your own AGI timeline

0:00 20VC: Is More Compute the Answer to Model Performance | Why OpenAI Abandons Products, The Biggest Opportunities They Have Not Taken & Analysing Their Race for AGI | What Companies, AI Labs and Startups Get Wrong About AI with Ethan Mollick

Ethan Mollick · Jul 31, 2024

Essentially every startup being funded today is implicitly betting against AGI, because none of them would survive in an AGI world

If AGI means a machine smarter than humans at every task, the machine decides what to do and nobody needs your human-facing product; already a single Claude prompt will generate 30 product ideas, rate them, build a playable prototype and interview you as a user

Scope: no one actually knows what AGI looks like; he declines to paint a specific science-fictional future

39:05 20VC: Is More Compute the Answer to Model Performance | Why OpenAI Abandons Products, The Biggest Opportunities They Have Not Taken & Analysing Their Race for AGI | What Companies, AI Labs and Startups Get Wrong About AI with Ethan Mollick

Harry Stebbings · Aug 5, 2024

It is inconsistent to believe in AGI and still invest in SaaS, because an SMB tax accounting product would not survive AGI

If AGI arrives, vertical SaaS products cease to exist, so belief in AGI and SaaS investing cannot be held together

39:37 20VC: Sequoia's David Cahn on AI's $600BN Question | Why the Data Centre is the Most Important Asset | Servers, Steel and Power: The Core Pillars Powering the Future of AI

David Cahn · Aug 5, 2024

Believing in AGI while continuing to invest in SaaS is an inconsistent position

40:09 20VC: Sequoia's David Cahn on AI's $600BN Question | Why the Data Centre is the Most Important Asset | Servers, Steel and Power: The Core Pillars Powering the Future of AI

Your assistant can query this graph directly — 4 positions here, 19,646 across the corpus. Add 996.fm over MCP.