Will a new wave of foundation model companies displace today's incumbent labs?
34 recorded positions from 21 people, first said May 17, 2023. They do not agree — the readings below are what each one actually argued.
Compute and infrastructure advantage means incumbent labs get there first
Larry Aschebrook · Jun 16, 2025
The way to play AI is to buy the established leaders, because nothing will rival OpenAI and Anthropic's scale within three years
Nothing is holding back the next generation of LLMs except time and capital, which the incumbents already have
71:09 20VC: How We Made $800M on Coursera | We Lost Money on Uber and Made Money on Lyft | We Did 3x on Postmates in 18 Months | DPI is King, MOIC is BS | We Dodged Theranos and I Still Lost Millions with Larry Aschebrook @ G Squared
Larry Aschebrook · Jun 16, 2025 · hedged
The LLM space is very hard for new entrants because catching up requires both time and enormous capital
Time and capital are the binding constraints, and incumbents already have both
73:18 20VC: How We Made $800M on Coursera | We Lost Money on Uber and Made Money on Lyft | We Did 3x on Postmates in 18 Months | DPI is King, MOIC is BS | We Dodged Theranos and I Still Lost Millions with Larry Aschebrook @ G Squared
Harry Stebbings · Jun 16, 2025
At the foundation model layer there is really only OpenAI and Anthropic, with little room for additional winners
74:50 20VC: How We Made $800M on Coursera | We Lost Money on Uber and Made Money on Lyft | We Did 3x on Postmates in 18 Months | DPI is King, MOIC is BS | We Dodged Theranos and I Still Lost Millions with Larry Aschebrook @ G Squared
Brendan Foody · Sep 15, 2025 · hedged
The largest model builders that will exist have already been created
The CapEx on data and compute, plus the cost of assembling research teams, has become prohibitively expensive for new entrants
Scope: not 100% sure; breakthroughs enabling further model progress could still come from startups
40:53 20VC: Mercor: From $1M to $500M in 17 Months: The Fastest Growing Company in the World | How to Think About Margins and Revenue Sustainability in AI | Why Evaluation Benchmarks in AI are BS Today with Brendan Foody
Mike Mignano · Jul 6, 2026 · hedged
If recursive self-improvement happens, it is most likely achieved by one of the existing frontier labs rather than a newcomer
They already have vast compute advantages, frontier models, infrastructure and chips
Scope: 'if I were to bet'; a new architecture from labs like Thinking Machines or Safe Superintelligence could still leapfrog everything
17:02 20VC: Why Now is the Time for the Application Layer | Why OpenAI & Anthropic Won't Win the App Layer | Why Startups Should be TokenMaxxing | Why VCs Should Reduce Weighting on Price & Ownership in an Age of AI with Mike Mignano, USV
Incumbent labs will be displaced history repeats
Douwe Kiela · Jun 30, 2023 · speculative
Today's leading labs like OpenAI and Anthropic represent a first-generation technology analogous to Lycos and AltaVista, while Contextual's approach is the PageRank-equivalent that could make it the Google of language models
Their technology is the right architecture at the right time, so with the right execution it could displace the incumbents as PageRank did early search engines
Scope: conditional on 'all the stars aligning' and right execution; stated as what he would hope for
38:42 20VC: Why Data Size Matters More Than Model Size, Why The Google Employee Was Wrong; OpenAI and Google Have the Advantage & Why Open Source is Not Going to Win with Douwe Kiela, Co-Founder @ Contextual AI
Aravind Srinivas · Jun 15, 2026
No AI company can sit comfortably on a current win — if Anthropic treats Claude Code as already won, they won't even be around in six to twelve months
Even OpenAI's seemingly unassailable consumer position two years ago has become contestable, showing anyone can be pushed into fighting from behind
Scope: about the field generally, not a specific prediction of Anthropic's demise
7:49 20VC: Micron Will Be More Valuable Than Meta | How Export Controls Helped Not Hurt China | Power is the Bottleneck to AI | Why Dario Has Done a Disservice to AI with his Labour Replacement Messaging with Aravind Srinivas, Founder @ Perplexity
David Frankel · Aug 8, 2026
OpenAI and Anthropic becoming seismic changes the landscape for the better, and they in turn will eventually be displaced
The ecosystem has repeatedly displaced apparently unassailable incumbents — Microsoft looked undisruptable and Google did it; Google looked undisruptable and search now starts elsewhere
57:24 20VC: The AI Boom Will Create Enormous Roadkill: Who Wins & Loses | Why Founders Should Never Take Multi-Stage Money at Seed | Why Triple, Triple, Double, Double is Good Enough
About half of neolabs die or get absorbed
Matt Murphy · Jul 27, 2026
Neolabs are overheated — round sizes are far too large for company stage and there is no way 60+ independent model companies survive alongside open source
There are 60+ neolabs, many generic 'get the band together' research plays; not all can have great acquihires, creating huge concentrated risk positions for some firms
Scope: he still likes the sector and Menlo is in seven; distinguishes focused labs like Chai and Axiom from generic ones
55:42 20VC: Leading Anthropic's First Ever Round | Will Open Source Threaten Anthropic's Business | Do Margins Matter in a World of AI | Why Triple, Triple, Double, Double is Not Good Enough Today | Why Series A is Hard Today with Matt Murphy @ Menlo
Anastasios Angelopoulos · Aug 3, 2026
Most neolabs are overrated, but Black Forest Labs is underrated
60:44 20VC: 70% of Neolabs Will Die | There Will be a $100BN US Open-Source Model | Data is a Trillion $ Market | Governments Cannot Regulate Models: It is Too Late | The Cyber Attacks to Come Will be Insane with Anastasios Angelopoulos @ Arena
Alex Atallah · Aug 10, 2026 · hedged
Roughly 50% rather than 70% of neolabs will die or consolidate over the next three years
There aren't that many neolabs and 70% seems too high, though counting acquisition by a model lab as death raises the number
Scope: only if acquisition/consolidation counts as dying
52:46 20VC: Will OpenRouter Sell for $10BN to Stripe? | Why Chinese Open Models Are Beating America—and What Happens Next | Why Enterprises Are More Fearful of Anthropic and OpenAI Than China | Is the Routing Layer Becoming a Commodity with Alex Atallah
Training frontier foundation models is so capital and talent intensive that only about five players remain viable
Emad Mostaque · May 17, 2023
There will only be five or six foundation model companies in the world in three to five years, and all of them already exist today (Stability, NVIDIA, Google, Microsoft/OpenAI, Meta, Apple).
Training frontier models requires capital at a scale only a handful of players can sustain — Google alone spends ~$20B a year on AI and DeepMind's salary budget is ~$1.2B.
Scope: three to five year horizon
42:51 20VC: Why the AI Bubble Will Be Bigger Than The Dot Com Bubble, Why AI Will Have a Bigger Impact Than COVID, Why No Models Used Today Will Be Used in a Year, Why All Models are Biased and How AI Kills Traditional Media with Emad Mostaque, Founder & CEO @
Aravind Srinivas · Jun 5, 2024
Competing as a foundation model trainer against OpenAI is one of the worst arenas to be in, with only about five players left standing.
The game is extremely hard to play given the capital and talent required.
Scope: counts Google, Anthropic, Meta, Mistral and possibly xAI post-funding
21:17 20VC: Perplexity's Aravind Srinivas on Will Foundation Models Commoditise, Diminishing Returns in Model Performance, OpenAI vs Anthropic: Who Wins & Why the Next Breakthrough in Model Performance will be in Reasoning
Aravind Srinivas · Jun 5, 2024
Second-tier models — not cutting edge but cheap enough to build a business on — will get commoditized, while a small set of frontier models stay differentiated and are contested by only three or four players.
23:26 20VC: Perplexity's Aravind Srinivas on Will Foundation Models Commoditise, Diminishing Returns in Model Performance, OpenAI vs Anthropic: Who Wins & Why the Next Breakthrough in Model Performance will be in Reasoning
Agi is still early stage leaving room for new entrants
Matt Clifford · Jul 1, 2024
It is not too late to build an AGI company — the most ambitious founders today should seriously consider whether that's what they can do.
Scope: reversal of his view from twelve months earlier that the ship had sailed and there would only be three or four such companies
55:35 20VC: LLMs Are Reaching a Stage of Diminishing Returns: What is the Next S Curve | The Bull & Bear Case for China's Ability to Challenge the US' AI Capabilities | How AI Changes the Future of War & How Agents Will Reshape Society with Matt Clifford @ EF
Edwin Chen · Jul 21, 2025
We are only a few percent of the way toward true AGI, so there is enormous headroom for unexpected breakthroughs and new entrants despite the capital intensity
Real AGI means systems that cure cancer, send rockets to Mars and design new philosophical systems, not just automating an L3 or L4 engineer; assuming today's leaders are final is like assuming ten years ago that Google would be the last search engine, and future breakthroughs may come from AIs themselves working with humans
Scope: conditional on a demanding definition of AGI
60:28 20VC: Scaling to $1BN+ in Revenue with No Funding: Surge AI | The Most Insane Scaling Story in Tech |
Revenue backed challengers survive zero revenue ones do not
Anastasios Angelopoulos · Aug 3, 2026
A neolab valued at $10B today must generate roughly $4B of revenue within two to three years to justify a 10x outcome, and failing that it will hemorrhage talent
At a 25-30x revenue multiple, becoming a $100B business requires ~$4B in revenue; without it the business bleeds out its people
Scope: assumes a 25-30x revenue multiple
36:59 20VC: 70% of Neolabs Will Die | There Will be a $100BN US Open-Source Model | Data is a Trillion $ Market | Governments Cannot Regulate Models: It is Too Late | The Cyber Attacks to Come Will be Insane with Anastasios Angelopoulos @ Arena
Anastasios Angelopoulos · Aug 3, 2026
Mistral will do great and Eleven Labs will become a public company
These are not zero-revenue valuations; unlike the labs he is criticising, they have substantial revenue behind their valuations
39:00 20VC: 70% of Neolabs Will Die | There Will be a $100BN US Open-Source Model | Data is a Trillion $ Market | Governments Cannot Regulate Models: It is Too Late | The Cyber Attacks to Come Will be Insane with Anastasios Angelopoulos @ Arena
Displacement comes from chinese open source challengers
David Frankel · Aug 8, 2026
Anthropic and OpenAI will unequivocally be disrupted, and there is an excellent chance the disruption comes from China
Platforms never stay dominant forever — the entire history of venture is disruption of incumbents like Microsoft and Google
67:33 20VC: The AI Boom Will Create Enormous Roadkill: Who Wins & Loses | Why Founders Should Never Take Multi-Stage Money at Seed | Why Triple, Triple, Double, Double is Good Enough
Harry Stebbings · Aug 8, 2026
Innovation cycles have compressed so far that the AI incumbents are being attacked by Chinese open source models before they have even established their incumbency
The speed of innovation cycles has accelerated
67:53 20VC: The AI Boom Will Create Enormous Roadkill: Who Wins & Loses | Why Founders Should Never Take Multi-Stage Money at Seed | Why Triple, Triple, Double, Double is Good Enough
Also on the record
Carles Reina · Apr 11, 2026
A new wave of foundational model companies is coming, and the incumbents (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, ElevenLabs) will end up acquiring them for a few billion each and folding in their research
The new wave unlocks a brand new world of opportunities and incumbents will buy the research teams
79:25 Incumbents acquire the next wave research teams
Arthur Mensch · Apr 29, 2024 · hedged
He would not recommend starting a new foundational model company today, but it would be arrogant to claim no new entrant could arise and beat Mistral
Sam Altman advised against it a year ago and Mistral did it anyway and changed things, which shows such advice can be wrong
42:50 Starting a new foundation model company today is ill advised but not impossible to succeed
Hemant Taneja · Sep 22, 2025 · hedged
Mistral will build a compelling business and has caught back up on model quality after falling behind
They fell behind because they were compute- and capital-constrained, but Arthur has grown from scientist to CEO, learned to aggregate capital, and shifted to a commercial customer relationship rather than build-it-and-they-will-come
45:15 Capital constrained challengers can catch back up by shifting to commercial focus
Aravind Srinivas · Jun 15, 2026
Frontier model providers stay relevant only by continuously shipping new capabilities; anyone winning today can lose tomorrow
The prize is enormous — Anthropic reached roughly Meta's valuation in six years versus Meta's twenty — so no one can relax and a six-month gap without new capability is damaging
66:24 Leadership is perpetually contestable shipping cadence decides
Matt Clifford · Jul 1, 2024 · hedged
A new path to building a frontier AI company is now open: a genuinely different idea plus a compelling demo can unlock the capital to compete, rather than the old route of having trained a large model inside a lab and then raising on that.
Like DeepMind ten years ago, a demo that makes people sit up can attract the capital needed to go up against the incumbents, because ideas now carry more value.
9:58 A differentiated idea and compelling demo can unlock capital to compete with incumbent labs
Anastasios Angelopoulos · Aug 3, 2026 · hedged
Top researchers have largely concentrated at the frontier labs, but a growing cohort is leaving because those labs now feel like big companies where they can't have impact — and this exodus will become more extreme once the labs go public
Scale reduces individual impact, and IPOs will sharpen that dynamic
36:08 Talent exodus from scaled labs accelerates after ipos
Christian Kleinerman · Sep 22, 2023 · hedged
The next wave of AI innovation will come from a hybrid of existing model incumbents and new startups rather than only one camp
Incumbents are certainly chasing these innovations, and the current moment has generated such a spur of creativity that most new startups want to chase some aspect of the generative revolution
18:38 Innovation comes from both incumbents and new startups not one camp
Christian Kleinerman · Sep 22, 2023
There is innovation everywhere in the core AI technology layer, not just in applications of existing models, so many new startups will create new things alongside continued research at OpenAI and Anthropic
At a recent dinner, separate startups described blending fine-tuning with prompting, addressing transformer model limitations, and improving computer vision
19:21 Innovation is happening broadly across many startups in the core model layer not just applications
Shyam Sankar · Jan 17, 2024 · hedged
Some core LLM winners already exist — OpenAI unquestionably, with Meta having impressively reinvented itself and Google still to be judged — but more winners are still to come
54:59 Openai and meta already established as winners google still undetermined
Emad Mostaque · May 17, 2023
Competing with OpenAI in proprietary models is extremely difficult, and generic 'OpenAI for Europe' plays will fail; the only viable edges are open standardization, full multi-modality, emerging markets, or deep verticals like defense, government or healthcare.
OpenAI is executing incredibly well and there's no reason to choose a regional clone over GPT-4 or Palm 2; verticals let you understand a domain deeply and become sticky, as Scale is doing by going into defense.
47:16 Vertical focus multimodality or emerging markets not generic cloning let new entrants compete with openai
Julien Bek · Aug 24, 2026
The only way to back a genuinely novel AI lab is to back an N-of-one founder pursuing a fundamentally different architecture rather than the same approach done better
If a differentiated architecture works the outcome is massive; being incrementally better at the same thing is not a path to success now
12:17 Only an n of one founder with a different architecture can win
Alex Lebrun · Jun 19, 2023
Incumbents can use AI to stay competitive in their existing markets but will not invent the disruptive products that would kill their own business
They mostly sprinkle AI dust on existing products as enhanced features rather than rethinking the paradigm, and like Kodak with the digital camera they won't release what cannibalises their main revenue
18:51 Capital talent and focus can still launch competitive new foundation model companies like mistral
Eiso Kant · Oct 7, 2024
Consolidation of smaller AI labs is largely finished — there are very few companies left that are far enough along to be acquisition targets
Only a handful of sufficiently advanced independent players remain (Cohere, Reka, Mistral), and xAI is very unlikely to be acquired
39:48 Consolidation of smaller ai labs is largely complete few viable targets remain
Aravind Srinivas · Jun 5, 2024 · hedged
Whether the frontier ends with one winner or three or four depends on who cracks bootstrapped reasoning first — if they then put all their capital into scaling it, it ends as one player; if they hedge, it doesn't.
Cracking self-improving reasoning gives a lead that can be extended indefinitely by concentrating capital on scaling it.
23:46 Whether the frontier consolidates to one winner or several depends on whether the reasoning breakthrough leader concentrates capital on scaling it
Your assistant can query this graph directly — 34 positions here, 19,646 across the corpus. Add 996.fm over MCP.