Should the US increase government R&D and energy research funding to compete with China?
5 recorded positions from 4 people, first said Aug 18, 2023. They do not agree — the readings below are what each one actually argued.
Cuts are a serious negative because rnd spillovers are broad
Andrew Ng · Nov 17, 2025
If America stops investing in attracting global talent, that would be an unforced error, and damaging university research funding would also be very unfortunate
Attracting talent has been one of America's huge competitive advantages, and higher-education resources are what train grad students and sustain science
9:26 20VC: Andrew NG on The Biggest Bottlenecks in AI | How LLMs Can Be Used as a Geopolitical Weapon | Do Margins Matter in a World of AI? | Is Defensibility Dead in a World of AI? | Will AI Deliver Masa Son's Predictions of 5% GDP Growth?
David Frankel · Aug 8, 2026
The US is underspending on R&D and energy research relative to China, and the Trump administration's cuts to research funding are a serious negative
DARPA-style R&D finds its way into every nook and cranny of the economy, and cutting spend that flows back into society is problematic
Scope: concedes universities have squandered a lot of the money
69:19 20VC: The AI Boom Will Create Enormous Roadkill: Who Wins & Loses | Why Founders Should Never Take Multi-Stage Money at Seed | Why Triple, Triple, Double, Double is Good Enough
Also on the record
Richard Socher · Aug 18, 2023
Governments should fund science and especially open science, but they are structurally bad at funding uncertain research because failures draw taxpayer complaints and force more bureaucracy
When a funded project doesn't work out, taxpayers complain that their money was wasted, which pushes the process toward bureaucracy
24:17 Government funding of uncertain research suffers structural bureaucratic risk aversion
Martin Casado · Jul 28, 2025
The US should make AI a national priority the way China does—funding it like crazy, involving the national labs and academia, and pursuing both open and closed efforts
The US did exactly this during the nuclear simulation era, when the same fears about compute proliferation existed; by choosing to lead and funding academia and the labs, the US won and controlled the technical discourse of the planet, and now it wants to put its head in the sand instead
29:59 Fund ai as a national priority like the nuclear simulation era
Martin Casado · Jul 28, 2025
The US should fund academia and the national labs as much or more than it does, and simultaneously the funding system needs structural change because indirect costs have gotten way out of hand
Indirect costs are a long-standing bipartisan problem—Obama tried and failed to address them—and every researcher he knows agreed they were terrible until Trump was the one doing it; but shifts in funding are genuinely disruptive, so the right path through is complex
31:38 Fund academia and labs more while fixing bloated indirect costs
Your assistant can query this graph directly — 5 positions here, 19,646 across the corpus. Add 996.fm over MCP.