Skip to content

Debates

Are the people who achieve extraordinary things fundamentally different from everyone else?

5 recorded positions from 5 people, first said Nov 28, 2022. They do not agree — the readings below are what each one actually argued.

Up close they are ordinary which is what unlocks belief

Miki Kuusi · Nov 28, 2022

The people you look up to are not fundamentally different from anyone else — they were hardworking and smart and also got lucky; there are no sages operating at a higher level of sentience

Getting to know accomplished people over time revealed they are ultimately similar people

56:51 20VC: Wolt CEO, Miki Kuusi on Leadership Lessons Scaling to a Reported $8.1BN Exit to Doordash, Building Teams not Families, The Difference Between Trust and Safety Within Companies, How To Use Compensation to Create Culture & Why You Should Not Be Lookin

Brendan Foody · Jun 1, 2026

Most people who accomplish extraordinary things are, up close, fairly normal, and realizing this is what unlocks people's belief they can achieve at that level too

He expected Harvard/MIT students and young founders to be dramatically smarter, and found them smart but ordinary — e.g. Ethan Thornton raising $70M at 19 as a chill friend

Scope: not all of them

58:13 20VC: Mercor CEO on Why Application Layer Companies Have No Defensibility, The Model is the Product | Token Spend Will Exceed Headcount Spend in 5 Years | The True Cost of Hiring AI Researchers in the Valley Today with Brendan Foody

Also on the record

Aravind Srinivas · Jun 15, 2026

Elon Musk's defining entrepreneurial skill is zoning out everything else to focus solely on the current limiting problem, and it is extremely hard to replicate

It requires being genuinely good at concentration and at ignoring even important things that distract from the core objective — Aravind cannot do it himself at Perplexity

74:04 A rare untransferable focus on the limiting problem separates them

Harry Stebbings · Sep 15, 2025

The best founders combine a superiority complex (believing they're better than everyone) with an inferiority complex (never satisfied with their current state).

Pattern he says he observes across interviews with the best founders.

6:53 Superiority and inferiority complex combo defines the best founders

Matt Clifford · Jul 1, 2024

Talent is largely fungible: there is no distinct class of 'founders' versus 'non-founders', only talent and ambition that can be applied to trading or to entrepreneurship with equally strong results.

The 'forced entrepreneurs' research shows people pushed out of finance into founding companies outperform those who chose to found in normal years, implying the same underlying talent produces great outcomes in whichever field it's directed at.

47:53 Talent and ambition are fungible across founding and other domains

Your assistant can query this graph directly — 5 positions here, 19,646 across the corpus. Add 996.fm over MCP.