Should pro rata rights go only to the round lead or to all major shareholders?
6 recorded positions from 5 people, first said Mar 18, 2024. They do not agree — the readings below are what each one actually argued.
Pro rata is earned not contractual
Gili Raanan · Mar 18, 2024
A seed firm with strong industry relationships can reliably get the pro rata check size it wants even in rounds it doesn't price.
Lead investors in the industry are friends and respect the partnership, so taking pro rata is easy.
Scope: based on Cyberstarts' own experience; depends on having strong relationships with lead investors
48:22 20VC: 19 Company Portfolio: 1 Decacorn, 7 Unicorns, 4 Acquisitions; One of the Best Seed Investors of All Time on How to Pick Generational Defining Founders, Why Nothing but the Founder Matters & Why the Best Investors are Never Happy w/ Gili Raanan
Delian Asparouhov · Jul 29, 2024
No investor is entitled to their pro rata
Having been on the founder side of the table, investor entitlement can rub you the wrong way
37:39 20VC: Twitter's Most Controversial VC Delian Asparouhov on Inside the Walls of Founders Fund: What the World Does Not See | Why Western Europe Will Be Like the Third World | Why SaaS as an Industry Might Be Dead
Harry Stebbings · Oct 22, 2025
Pro rata should not be an automatic right — it should be earned
23:53 20VC: Deel CEO Alex Bouaziz on Raising $300M+ at a $17BN Valuation | Deel vs Rippling: WTF is Going On | Management Lessons from Ben Horowitz and Nik Storonsky | Deel's M&A Playbook: Lessons from 13 Acquisitions: What Works & What Doesn't
Harry Stebbings · Nov 21, 2025
Pro rata is not a real legal right but a moral obligation an investor earns by stepping up
No one should have a right to future rounds by contract; you earn the right to write another check
44:51 20VC: Max Altman on The New Seed War: Can Anyone Compete with Sequoia and a16z | Leaving $2BN on the Table with Reddit | Lessons from Backing Rippling at $25M Post | Why Climate Tech is a Mirage and Disaster
Also on the record
David Frankel · Aug 8, 2026 · hedged
Rounds that grant pro rata only to the lead rather than all major shareholders are the wrong approach; investors should be treated uniformly
There should be a universal approach that treats your investors equally, otherwise it creates unfairness and negative correlation bias
29:17 Treat all major investors uniformly on pro rata
Max Altman · Nov 21, 2025
Seed funds should model pro rata at only 70-80% of their entitlement, because when a top firm leads the next round you rarely get your full allocation
In great deals led by firms like Sequoia or Kleiner, allocation gets cut, and investors should be honest with themselves about that
45:03 Model pro rata at a discount because leads cut allocation
Your assistant can query this graph directly — 6 positions here, 19,646 across the corpus. Add 996.fm over MCP.