Skip to content
20VCJun 20, 2026

Why Remote Work is White Collar Fraud

Why Revenge and Patriotism are the Best Founder Traits · Two Questions Every Founder Needs to Ask · The Wild Story of Raising $1BN from Masa Son in an Hour Long Meeting with Ryan Peterson, Founder @ Flexport

With Ryan Petersen · Harry Stebbings

Full transcript · 79 min · 17,282 words · 2 speakers

Cold open

I say it’s white collar fraud. I have a three year old and a five year old. The idea that I could do any work at my house is like a total fantasy. Like, come on. You’re kidding. I think the negotiation that we’re going have with Salesforce should be a lot different than the last one. I think selling SaaS to tech companies is gonna be a tough business because we can build stuff ourselves. Revenge and patriotism is a great investment thesis. There’s a lot of collusion in VC. Like, I have a feeling that most VCs actually collude more with competitors than with their own partners.

Ryan Petersen0:00

This is 20 VC

Harry Stebbings0:27

Intro

Harry Stebbings

with me, Harry Stebbings. Now I’ve done 3,000 shows. The best guests have two things. They have high IQ, and they do not give a shit. Our guest today is a longtime friend of mine, Ryan Petersen, founder of Flexport. He’s been on many shows before. I don’t think he’s ever had a conversation as open and honest as this. I think the friendship allowed for a much more authentic and transparent discussion where we touched on everything from Chinese open source models, is the CCP at risk, why remote work is like white collar fraud?

And so much more. Ryan was incredible, and this also goes to show why doing shows in person is 10 x better than remote. Ryan, in studio, this is one you cannot miss. But before we dive into the show today,

· Sponsor read0 min · 604 words
Harry Stebbings1:10

meet Ava, the first autonomous AI BDR built by Artisan to run your entire outbound on autopilot.

Unknown

Hey. Jason Lebkin from SaaStr here. Artisan is s tier. We’ve replaced our entire outbound sales team with Artisan. I believe we’ve sent over 50,000 highly customized emails to Artisan. The open rate is twice what it was with humans, and they close 100 k deals day after day.

Harry Stebbings

Eva sources leads from over 250,000,000 contacts, enriches every prospect with intense signals, then writes and sends personalized multichannel outreach, self optimizing over time. When a lead replies, she handles objections and books meetings straight into your AE’s calendars without any human input. Artisan is backed by Y Combinator and has raised $36,000,000 to build the first truly autonomous AI BDR. Hire Ava, the AI BDR, and get $300 in credits when you sign up at at artisan.co/20vc. That’s artisan.co/20vc. While artisan scales your outbound motion, granola turns every call into clean notes.

When I’m not recording the world’s greatest freaking podcast, I’m probably in meetings. Pitch meetings, board meetings, LP meetings, I can’t get enough of them. When all the meetings are over, I look at my notes and they make no sense to me. Illegible scribbles. That’s why I use Granola. Granola is the AI notepad for people in back to back meetings. I say back to back because it makes me feel busy and special. So I jot down rough notes like many do, And in the background, granola transcribes and turns them into really clear useful notes immediately after the meeting ends.

And I’ve been using granola for months, and my favorite feature is chatting to my notes. No one else will chat to me these days. And I can ask it anything, and it trills through every meeting I’ve ever had and finds the answer. What was the valuation of the startup that pitched me last week? Who on my team said they would share the memo? And even coaching and tips, like how can I ask founders better questions when they’re pitching me? All the best operators I know use Granola to help them get more done.

So if you’re in a lot of meetings, trust me, this is a really good tool for you. It takes seconds to set up, connects to your calendar, works on any meeting platform, head over to granola.ai/20vc, and get three months free with the code 20VC. That’s granola.ai/20vc with the code 20V C. That’s 20V C. Once granola turns the conversation into clear notes, Finn turns that clarity into better customer support. As AI agents become more common in customer experience, teams often end up juggling multiple silo tools for every job.

Well, Finn was built to change that. It’s a single unified agent that works across your entire customer experience from service to sales to success and beyond. Finn is the agent making perfect customer experiences possible for thousands of customers. It’s powered by custom models, trained on years of real customer interactions, so it understands the nuance and complexity of customer service better than any other agent. That means faster resolutions, more consistent support, and just better experiences for every customer. It’s also designed to be fully self manageable so you can easily improve and adapt it as your business evolves.

No third parties required. Leading companies like Gamma, Asana, DoorDash, and crypto.com already use and love Finn to deliver better customer experiences. So for a limited time, you can get $500 a month in Finn credits for your first three months. Learn more at finn.ai/20vc. You have now arrived at your destination.

Conversation

Harry Stebbings4:42

Ryan, I cannot wait for this. Dude, we’ve done this a couple of times remote, but I feel that’s much more special in person. We’re gonna get to remote work, but remote interviews, not as good as in person, dude. So thank you for being here. Yeah. It’s great. Dude, I wanna start on what motivates you more? I’m finding this really interesting pattern. It’s either the fear of losing or it’s the thrill of winning. Which one is it for you? Interesting question. Probably the fear of

Ryan Petersen5:07

losing. Why? Be I don’t a loser. We just like to you never win enough. Right? Like, you I’ve already won, and yet I still am like I don’t feel like I won by any standard of what I set out when I started the company. Like, I’ve won. My first and only financial model that I made for myself for the business got to 1,000,000 of revenue. Right?

Harry Stebbings

Like, we did over 2,000,000,000 last year. So I hate Excel models. I’m terrible at it. When I open up Excel, it says sign in or register. And I’m just like, I’ll leave it with someone else.

Ryan Petersen

I’m not very organized. So Are you not? No. And, like, I feel like making a good model requires you to, like, organize your stuff.

Harry Stebbings

So today’s rule is we’re gonna play a game. Now you’ve done shows before. Every single question that I ask has to be a question that no one else has asked before. Okay. And if I ask a question that someone has asked before, you have to tell me, and I will donate 100 to a charity. Oh, wow.

Unknown6:09

Oh, great. Alright. So we’re gonna do I get to pick the charity? What are we gonna do? Sure. What’s your charity? My mom’s got MS. Oh, that’s great. I’ll go do that next I’ll it to an MS charity.

Harry Stebbings

God bless

Unknown

her.

Harry Stebbings

But that’s the deal. Okay? Okay. So these questions could be fucking weird or interesting.

Ryan Petersen

Do I still answer the question? No. I don’t answer.

Harry Stebbings

I just go $100. No. You just go bang bang. Great. But if you lie, you pay a thousand dollars. Oh. So if it’s a hard question So I get out of any questions just by paying a thousand dollars. Yeah. Actually, not a bad joke. That was a bad start, Harry. You should have rethought your rules. The first one I wanted to ask is, when we were chatting before, you said about the nature of VC jobs and why it means that inevitably the way that VC’s jobs work is they end up as herd animals.

Why did you think that was something interesting we should discuss?

Ryan Petersen

Well, VC your show is called twenty Minute VC, so what’s the hot take on venture capital? The nature of the job is simply that it’s just such a good job. If someone who likes to have a job, what would be the attributes? Like, pays really well, you basically don’t have a boss, once you’re like a partner, like some level of seniority, have no boss, pays well, you don’t have to be anywhere on any given day, kind of not a fixed schedule, and it’s very hard to measure if you’re good or not, on any reasonable timeframe.

You can’t get fired. These are pretty good attributes of a job. So, like, therefore And security.

Harry Stebbings7:28

Like, you have fun fees for ten years. I mean, not only can you not get fired, but, like, dude, I run a media company. You run a company. Revenues can go down. They are not certain. You know, fund fees are legally structured.

Ryan Petersen

Yeah. So you have to if you are a partner now if you run the fund, that’s one thing. But if you’re like a partner that doesn’t own the fund, you could get fired. So you don’t have infinite job security. So your whole thing has to be, how do I avoid getting fired? You can do this in reverse or invert the problem, and you go, well, how would you get fired as a VC? Okay, like, scandal. Sure, avoid that. And you can’t allow everyone else who works at your firm to think you’re dumb or doing bad things, like doing stupid deals.

They don’t know it can be bad deals like that or they can be great deals. You can be doing great deals. But if people think they’re bad deals, you might lose your job. So therefore, Okay, I need everyone. You’re going to get consensus, right? And you’re also going to channel check all your deals. You’re going to like check with your competitors. There’s a lot of collusion in VC. VCs are constantly talking to each other, in part because they need to make sure that they don’t step out on the edge and do something that their own partners are going to think are dumb.

Like, have a feeling that most VCs actually collude more with competitors than with their own partners, because they need to spot check their deal and make sure it’s good before bringing it to the other partners to make sure that they’re not seen as being dumb.

Harry Stebbings8:50

So that’s you where get the herd behavior. I love Keith Raboy who says that, actually, he likes to sense check his deals with friends. And if they don’t think that his deal is stupid or crazy, he’s not doing his job.

Ryan Petersen9:02

Oh, yeah. Okay. Good. Yes. He’s see, I think founder’s fund Keith was at founder’s fund for a while. There there’s a few funds that avoid this type of behavior somehow. Or some people are just born into it with a contrarian

Harry Stebbings

bone in their you know? But Do you think you can only do stupid or crazy shit because you have money now? Me personally? I don’t have that much money. That’s what I’m doing. So But you don’t need money. No. Have enough. Have enough. Yeah. Like, when you’re paying rent and school fees, it’s like, oh, gosh. Fingers crossed. I think that richer investors make better investors. Sequoia are focused on upside maximization. How big could this be? They are not fearful of LPs coming back for their next fund.

They’re not fearful of deployment speed compressing, so they’re elongated. They just invest in what they think can be mega companies.

Ryan Petersen

When I started as an entrepreneur, it was kind of Now it’s like everybody’s becoming an entrepreneur, but I started doing companies in the early 2000s, late ’90s, even with my older brother. I I guess at that time, it was less mainstream to start a company. And we weren’t in Silicon Valley. We weren’t we didn’t call ourselves like tech startup. We didn’t raise venture. We were just hustling to make money. And one of my tricks actually was I moved to China when I was 25 years old for this company.

My And rent was $120 a month for a two bedroom apartment in a nice part of a second tier city. But it was like a nice And so I knew, like, that actually gave me a lot of permission to be an entrepreneur, which was kind of crazy, doing crazy stuff, because I knew I could live off of if I could make $500 a month, could survive. And I knew I could always make $500 a month. So, like, I could do a startup, I could take risks because I’m like, worst case, like, I lived in a nice apartment, in a nice town.

I had a good quality of life. My total OpEx was, $250 a month. So it gave me permission, yeah, to take some risk. But it’s the opposite. I’d have to be I was relatively rich. Right? Or, like, relatively secure.

Harry Stebbings10:52

Your number? What’s that mean? What’s your number basically means? What’s the number that you had in your head of like, ah, once I have this, I’ll be happy? So for me, it was always like $20,000,000 with the rationale that you have 5% interest, you make a million bucks a year for doing nothing. A million bucks a year is more than enough for anyone who’s adjusted, not mentally. Well, this is

Ryan Petersen11:12

how you know money is amazing because the more you have, the more you want. You can never satiate the human desire to that

Harry Stebbings

because I don’t. No? No. And, of course, you want more, but, like, I only buy trainers. I would much rather have more convenience than more money.

Ryan Petersen

I mean, I I haven’t been that motivated by money. I I’m more into, like, power. I wanna do big things.

Harry Stebbings

That’s really interesting. You know, there’s there was a question that my girlfriend asked me the other day. And she said, if you’d lost 90% of your money, how much of your self worth and self esteem would you lose in percent? What would you say? Maybe you’re more adjusted than me. I said I’ll go down 90%. No idea. But my mine is, like, my work is directly correlated to the financial outputs that you have, like, candidly. If you are a general in the army, your success in your profession does not correlate to your financial statement at the end of the day.

I’m a venture capitalist. The clue is in the name. If you’re good, you make bank. If you’re not, you don’t.

Ryan Petersen12:12

Yeah, But it’s you know, you gotta forget the past and the future. And, like, the future’s not written, so you can go make it. If Flexport would have raised today, what do you think you’d raise at? I don’t know. I really don’t know. I think this year, we’re going to get to basically breakeven. We’re on run rate to do about $450,000,000 of revenue, net revenue. Breaking news here. I haven’t shared that, but $450,000,000 of net revenue. What’s your growth rate? Last year was three fifty. 350%?

No. Dollars $350,000,000 last year. So what is that? 100, about almost 30%. So you’re doing 30% now. You

Harry Stebbings

said four fifty. Yeah.

Ryan Petersen

And I think we’ll do 600. I mean, goal is to keep going 30% every year for ten years. Think the big question and then beyond. But the big question for most startups, I think you have two things that you have to ask. Actually, got this from Paul Graham, where he said, every startup, if you see like a hockey stick growth curve, then there’s two questions you need to ask. Like, are they doing some kind of hack that’s unsustainable and going to stop working? Number one. And two is, is the market big enough for it to keep going?

And if the answer is like, no, there’s no hack. Like, this is genuine growth. And two, the market is really big. The thing will just keep going. Right? And I think Flexport is like that. Like the market well, there’s no hacks. It’s actually a grind. Like, we’ve got salespeople out there in the field, like, calling on businesses and going around the world. And then the market’s enormous. We’re still less than 1%, point 1%.

Harry Stebbings13:31

When you extrapolate that out, you said four fifty to 600, and then you can be seven fifty. And do you worry about the constraining exit landscape? Like, when you look at IPOs today, dude, unless you’re mega scale, you don’t wanna go out. With the greatest of respect, strategic buyers are less present than ever before. And then you’ve got buyout firms which are running for the hills because the Medallias and the Coopas and the Anaplans of the world are all looking pretty precarious right now. Do you think that’s a concern that should be felt?

Ryan Petersen14:01

I don’t think about it at all for Flexport. The word exit implies that I’m like gonna stop working at the you know, that I’m exiting. So I don’t think of it in that term. IPO would be Do you wanna take the company public? Yeah. We intend to go public. And I don’t know what the valuation is or should be or will be. It’s sort of like, well, but if we can just keep growing, you just draw the math out. But when do you think you should go public then?

I’d like to be a nicely profitable, making a few 100,000,000 of EBIT, and then we’ll go public. So it could happen in a couple of years. It should, the way that things are going right now. We should be able to get there. And like, you know, maybe it’s not don’t I know what it will be worth. And, like, the market kind of sets that at the end of the day. And and if it’s undervalued, okay. Like, as long as you’re generating a lot of cash, then you could if you’re really undervalued and you just buy your own shares back, and, like, maybe that’s a good thing.

Do think you should underprice on IPO day so you have the pop? You’re Or like, you should price to perfection? People focus so much on this. Like, I I don’t understand it. Like, of course, you’re gonna focus on your price and whatever. But people there’s this concept of, like, an IPO window that investment bankers and founders talk about. It’s like, oh, the window’s closed. You can’t go public. And, like, because the price won’t be there. But you’re like, well, what if you went public and then your price went down?

Is that better? I mean, it’s the same thing, isn’t it? So I don’t quite understand that dynamic. Like, I’m an operator, run a good business, like make it super profitable, have it grow. And like, don’t compare yourself too much to Anthropic or these AI companies that are we’ve been around for fifteen years, and there’s companies that are getting to our revenue in eighteen months. So you’re like, I think envy is a very bad is it one of the seven deadly sins?

Harry Stebbings15:27

Like, you certainly should avoid it. Do you worry about the concentration of value to a few companies? When you look at eight companies making up 85% of year to date gains in the stock markets, then you look at Anthropic and OpenAI, do you worry about that concentration of value to smaller and smaller number of names?

Ryan Petersen

As long as I’m allowed to use OpenAI and Anthropic, then I don’t mind at all. Like, they deserve it. These things are just incredible, miraculous products. What I worry about is that they cut us off and that we can’t use it anymore. If I can’t use OpenAI, we’re all going to go back to being just idiots we were two years ago. Like, if I you know, I need this stuff. Like, we’re so dependent on it, both personally. And then, like What do you need it for most?

It’s a ton of business logic. Like, lot of rules. Because every serve we’re an enterprise logistics company. We help businesses manage their cargo shipping around the world. Every business is unique and has their own process and their own, oh, we need this data and this format moved into this ERP system. Like, we want you to notify us. Some companies want to be notified ten days in advance of their container arriving at their warehouse and some seven. And like they really care about that. And they spend so much money that you have to do what they say.

So a lot of our tech is like this big rules engine and you get all these if then type statements of and it becomes very unwieldy. At the end of the day, it can’t really keep up, and you end up with people managing some of this business logic. Well, the agents can just do it.

Harry Stebbings16:45

And RPA couldn’t do that before, because I thought that was the promise of people who don’t know robotic process automation. I thought that was kind of the promise of RPA that was meant to be fulfilled.

Ryan Petersen

It does a lot, and we’ve gone a long ways with that. We’ve but but agents can go all the way. Like, we think we can automate the full end to end. And this is you’re building your own? We’re using OpenAI. We’re using Anthropic. We’re gonna increasingly use open source models to save money, but also because we don’t today have a budget constraint on our Anthropic contract. Did you see that article the other day? It’s like we spent $500,000,000. I thought that was sort of fake. We don’t have a budget on our contract.

Yet last Thursday, I woke up. I don’t know when we’re gonna air this, it was like a few days before the end of the month. It said your organization has reached your limit for the month, which it’s not true. Like, something went wrong in their side. But I had this, like, shot this moment of, like, oh, man. What if they just decide one day to, like, cut us off and say no? And I actually think this is a realistic scenario where they

Harry Stebbings17:37

Was the expense much more to the It’s not that much money for us. It’s not. How much is it? I think we’re spending, like, probably, like,

Ryan Petersen

5,000,000 a year or something, ramping pretty fast, though. Like, it’s doubled in the last few months.

Harry Stebbings

We we released the show with Brandon at McCorm. He said he spends more on Anthropic. Or no, he spends more on OpenAI, whichever one.

Ryan Petersen

Did I say I said 5,000,000 a year, right, and not a month a year?

Harry Stebbings

No. He spends more on models and compute than he does on salaries by far. I thought that was really interesting.

Ryan Petersen18:05

We’re not even close to that, but there’s a world where becomes I mean, it has to at some point, it’s very interesting.

Harry Stebbings

It has to for the valuations to be justified. So right now, Benioff said that he spends 300,000,000 a year on Anthropic for his team, which works out to 3.8% of developer salaries. For the trillion dollar valuation to be diversified, you need to be in the 18 to 20% range. We still need to see quite a movement.

Ryan Petersen

Yeah. We do see ourselves automating a ton of the work and taking it away with You have to, right? I mean, at five, I better save 5,000,000 a year in labor cost or make my product way better, which we are finding ways to make the product way better.

Harry Stebbings

Do you think you’re spending 20,000,000 a year on Anthropic in five years? Yeah. I mean, I don’t about Anthropic, but on LMs.

Ryan Petersen

100%. But it’s possible that the price comes way down, deflation. And it’s also possible that we move a lot of workflows on open sourcers, because if it’s good enough, like for our coding agents and for actually developing product, we probably always want the frontier model. But if you’re just automating a workflow, if the open source one that’s basically free can automate it, then there’s diminishing returns to frontier LLMs. And there’s diminishing returns also just doing it. Once I’ve automated all the work, I don’t want to keep spending the money.

I had the agent’s work. I should probably stop. Now, I’ll keep spending money on code and things that improve our product and our surface area that our customers interact with, but we have a lot of manual processes. Once they’re automated, I should stop spending the money on Anthropic.

Harry Stebbings19:28

I was a terrible interviewer. I interrupted you. You said there was a realistic scenario that

Ryan Petersen

Oh, there’s a realistic scenario that they decide that the compute that they have is more valuable for training superintelligence than it is for letting customers use it. And they stop you know, it cuts off.

Harry Stebbings

And we all just going back to being idiots. At point, that do you not think governments need to step in? Maybe. Yeah. Do you not think actually that you’re extrapolating it a bit far given the fact that I can’t even do fucking clips on AI right now? Like, this is my point. Like No. Yeah. No. I can’t do that. You’re you’re seeing Uber and Microsoft come saying, yeah, productivity gains are kind of questionable. I think that’s probably

Ryan Petersen20:05

true in those businesses. Our business has just tons of manual operations with humans, like, forwarding email. We call it freight forwarding. I often say it should be called freight email forwarding. It’s like people passing PDFs around and moving data between enterprise systems. There’s just, a huge amount of human labor. And I think that most of the economy looks like that, not like Uber, a which highly automated business. Although, I don’t know why they have, like, tens of 30,000 more employees because pretty automated. Right? Like, I don’t quite get that.

Harry Stebbings

You said the team is 2,000? Almost. Almost 2,000. Yeah. Twenty, thirty, four years’ time. How big is the team then? It might be about the same.

Ryan Petersen

We’re hiring a lot of salespeople, and we’re expanding a lot in new markets. But I think you’re gonna see a shift from people that today do operations, kind of manual work that I was describing earlier into, okay, the work style is gonna change. And if the people are not able to make that shift, then we’re gonna have to rebalance into much more customer facing account management, sales, kinda like, alright, how do you because I think that’s

Harry Stebbings21:07

the future is just like Do you know what think the future is super contributors? And I don’t see people talking about this enough. Zebb from ClickUp said this in his post, which we we chatted about before. But he essentially said he was cutting people so he could pay the super contributors 10 x more. You don’t need more salespeople. You need more fucking amazing salespeople who leverage AI, outbound AI tools, inbound AI tools, pipeline tools, forecasting tools to be the next great sales leader that leverages AI.

No? Certainly want as many of those people as you

Ryan Petersen

can get. There’s just like a lot of mass that you want out there in the field. I mean, think about our business. We’re global trade platform for global trade. There’s every business on the planet that needs to ship something anywhere. There’s a lot of boots on the ground that you want to just to interface with those companies out there. And there’s a limit to how many relationships a human can have. I think you can probably use AI and use other techniques to double that ratio or something.

But there’s some limit to how many relationships you can maintain. And it’s a relationship’s game at the end of the day, sales. And so I’m somewhat skeptical. This is an interesting question, though. Like, Yelp has 3,600 salespeople calling on restaurants. Wow. It’s actually a pretty good business. I think they haven’t grown that much, but they print cash. And, like, 3,600 salespeople if Yelp can have 3,600 salespeople, like, I feel like we should

Harry Stebbings22:28

have more than that. I interviewed the founder of Invisible, which is another data provider, and he said that you can’t do enterprise without a fully fledged FTE model. Do think you that’s true working with some of the biggest companies?

Ryan Petersen

No, it’s not true. You can do it without that, but your business is better. But if you can get that level of integration know, the freight industry was the original FTEs. They just weren’t engineers. Were just but one of the big tech companies that runs Hyperscaler, let’s call it, one of our direct competitors, 130 full time employees that work at that company that have badges that show up to work every day that run their logistics for them. And we cannot crack the door at that place.

Won’t say their name, but we cannot get our foot in the door, because all the decision making is done by our competitor. I think it’s an insane what an insanely great competitive advantage and positioning to have at, so I’m jealous. And I don’t know where you find but they’re not software engineers. These are just like logistics people. If you can get that same thing and just deeply embed yourself into the process workflow of a company, it’s so valuable. It’s not easy to do. And like, it’s not easy to find in the FTE model to find good FTEs who will know what to do, show up and do a good job every day and stay in the job and not have to turn over.

Harry Stebbings23:38

You also have a question of do truly great engineers want to be FTEs? Not often as close to the pure art of solving engineering problems that they want or great engineers want. It’s challenging.

Ryan Petersen

Yeah. Actually, speaking of the so it’s quite common in our industry where you have these forward deployed they’re not engineers, like I said. Forward deployed logisticians or something. They’re on-site. We had this huge customer win, one of our biggest ever. And I was like, Wow, this is great. But I had heard that our competitor has one of these forward deployed logisticians and runs their RFP, runs their process for choosing a freight forwarder, they always choose themselves. I’d heard about it and was like, wow, this is idiotic.

Why do they do this? It’s a great business.

Harry Stebbings24:19

Totally. They are going to choose me. And

Ryan Petersen

we won. And I was like, wow, what happened? And I found out the competitor had been acquired by another one of our competitors, and they did a huge layoff, and they fired the person. And she got hired by the company, and then they chose us to get back at them. So Wow. Never underestimate kind of corporate incompetence. What’s your largest customer? Like, not name, but size. I spend about $150,000,000 a year, the biggest one. We don’t have too many like that, but we have probably a dozen that spend over 50,000,000 and then a long tail.

Wow. Yeah. Logistics is expensive. It’s 11% of GDP. And they don’t have to be that big of a company. That’s the thing that I will often have to educate investors on, is logistics is a much bigger market than software. So, for example, a typical medium sized company will spend, call it 5% of their revenue. Companies spend about 5% if they’re physical goods companies, they’ll spend like 5% of their revenue on logistics. They’re not spending 5% on any software. At scale, our price point is similar what you would spend on Oracle or something for a comparably sized company.

It actually lasts. Like

Harry Stebbings25:30

But then you would say that we are not seeing the productivity gains in logistics that we are seeing in software creation. Because if we were, you’d be seeing revenue scaling in logistics like you have done for a cognition or a Cursor.

Ryan Petersen

You see cost come down at least. Yeah. I don’t know that you’re gonna see a huge revenue scaling of this. I mean, by the way, our competitors like us and others that are scaling, that are serving data center companies, that part of the business is growing like crazy because the data centers have to be built.

Harry Stebbings

The data center economy is fucking wild. It’s wild. Yeah. When we go back into the teams themselves, I am intrigued. You said about the use of Anthropic. Have you always used Anthropic, or has that been a switch?

Ryan Petersen26:05

We switched back and forth. We’re using Codex too. In fact, yeah, Codex won us over. They stole Sam stole my heart two months ago when he said you can have two months free. That was, like, thirty days ago, so we switched everything to Codex. So you switched everything to Codex? The engineers can choose both. What do the engineers choose? I think there’s still more there there’s still more habit formed on Claude, but they use Codex. We’re Cursor users. We use everything. As an enterprise, we’ve been more Gemini because we’re Google Doc centric, and so it’s, like, really nice how baked in it is in Notebook LM and these things, but all of our employees have Claude access as well.

Harry Stebbings

You’re able to invest in OpenAI or Anthropic. OpenAI is, whatever, 900, and Anthropic is a trillion. So it’s a slight difference on price. Yeah. But you can only invest in one. Which one do you invest in?

Ryan Petersen

Oh, I can only invest in one? Why? Why can’t I invest in both?

Harry Stebbings

Because I’m forcing you to choose. It’d be easy if you could choose both.

Ryan Petersen

At the same price? Let’s do same price. Yeah. Same price. I think I’m going Anthropic. No offense because Sam’s a friend of mine. Because the enterprise business? Yeah. The enterprise business seems great. And the team, I think there’s a lot of value of, like, this cohesive team that’s been together forever, and OpenAI has had ups and downs, and people have left. And it’s been hard to keep the whole team in place. And there’s just so much value in, like, founders that love each other, and no one quits and the talent density, etcetera.

So but OpenAI has, like, people that sleep on it. I would invest in both. Right? Like and I have I would do as much as I could into either of them. You invested in Anthropic? Yeah. Well done. No. But not, like, early. I’m not like What price did you do it at? No. It’s like 600 or something. It was already it’s already it already ran away, so I’m not gonna make much money off that. Doing it at 600 is not bad. Well, like two months later, I got my it wasn’t very long ago.

I just recently How much did you do? It’s it’s my finances are private, but not that much. I don’t have that much money. Do you worry about open source? And when I said Worry about as a threat to Anthropic? Yeah. Not I don’t care. That would be great.

Harry Stebbings27:55

I don’t know, dude. If you think about what you just said earlier, actually, which is a lot of the usage from frontier models can be moved over time for more mundane tasks to open source models, which we both agree on. That massively maims the market for the core providers. Yeah. If we only use them for the most frontier advanced tasks and everything else we can just push to open source or older models. Their core business is much smaller than you think.

Ryan Petersen28:21

No, but your question was, do I worry about that? I don’t care. I mean, Anthropic Go to zero, I don’t care. I didn’t put an amount of money that matters for me. So on my personal basis, and if AI and intelligence becomes really cheap, that’s, like, much better for the world and for for me.

Harry Stebbings

Do you worry given the majority of open source models are Chinese?

Ryan Petersen

Not really. I I don’t know how they work, like, how they can stay competitive on some level. But if they’re open source, open source. Like, who cares where they’re from? We can use them.

Harry Stebbings

Well, you’re feeding data back to the CCP would be the fear from Keith Rabour and others. And that actually CCP funded open source models are powering the majority of early stage Silicon Valley companies. And that essentially is giving a window into Silicon Valley for China. Yeah. It’s pretty interesting. I don’t I don’t personally spend a lot I don’t really sleep

Ryan Petersen29:06

over it. Do you do you sleep over China? Not really. I mean, I think I I’ve lived in I lived in China for a few years, and I speak Chinese passively. Not really well, but I could have a conversation. And so I feel like I know China better than most. It’s not a high bar. For sure. Yeah. On some level, I think that these that China and The US, there’s, like, a huge amount of mutual dependence there that is underplayed. And I think that there’s a lot the the interests align are much more aligned than people give credit.

And all this there’s so much saber rattling and so many people, like, trying to sound I don’t if they’re trying to sound smart or tough or something, but they’re casually throwing around, like, war between China and The United States without realizing that, like, such a thing would be a nuclear war, and you’d all be dead. And I so I don’t I I think that the odds of that happening are, like, pretty low. I don’t I don’t really believe that these countries are gonna suddenly start shooting nukes at each other.

And yet if you if you have war between these two

Harry Stebbings30:01

powers, like, that’s what it would be. So I loved it when Trump landed in China, and they played YMCA. Oh, they did? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And there’s this this, like, video of Trump, and you can see he’s kind of like a little child as a party desperate to dance, but not allowed to. Bad protocol. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And it’s just brilliant. Why the MCA play in the background?

Ryan Petersen

Well, remember when Obama went there, they didn’t even open the they didn’t roll out the red carpet. They didn’t bring up the stairs to the air force one. He had to, like air force one has its own stairs, but it’s, like, they’re not very good. They’re sort of awkward. You had to climb out the bottom of it. So

Harry Stebbings

Oh, wow. I did not know that. Yeah. You can look it up. And when when I think about China, sadly, days, I think about a mutual friend of ours, Keith Raboy, given his very open concerns around China. And it goes to something you said to me before, which was going back to kind of venture and fundraising, how you kind of fluffed or fucked up two funding rounds, very humble of you, and how Founders Fund bailed you out of them. I didn’t actually know this story. They’re both different stories.

God, it’d be rather embarrassing if you did the same mistake twice.

Ryan Petersen31:02

Yeah. Exactly. But they’re both my fault. Well, at least the first one was definitely my fault. Our Flexport Series B round, we were like a hot company. A VC came in and tried to preempt our round and offered us, for our scale and where we were, what were great terms. I think at that time it was like 50 on 100,000,000 valuation or something. Like this was in 2015, want to say 2016. It was pretty early in our journey. We were founded in 2013. So it was like they were good terms.

And I was very happy with the terms. And yet the VC wasn’t that famous or well known. They’re good. They’re a good firm. I’m not going say they’re they don’t need to be starting fights. But I decided and this is where I screwed up. I decided I could get the same or better terms from a better known investor. And so this was like on a Thursday. And I spent Friday and the weekend hustling, trying to like pitching a whole bunch of investors. But I had no I was being preempted.

So I had no data room or deck or anything that you would need to do a fundraise. And I think the word must have got back to this investor because he coached CBI I basically never talked to him again. He definitely didn’t show up with an actual term sheet. And then now I’m in the midst of a fundraise, where I’ve set this artificially high price, and I wasn’t fundraising, but you can’t turn off the fund I don’t know. We didn’t need money then, but we were going to need it within a year.

And so it was just like this very awkward position. Founders Fund was our investor at that time. They’d led the Series A. So first mistake, I should have just called Founders Fund day one and said, Hey, will you do this round? But like, I thought I was hot. Eventually I did call Founders Fund and told them, Yo, here’s what I screwed up. Like, I tried to raise money, failed. I did have an offer, but the best offer I got from my process that I ran post was like a 275,000,000 valuation instead of 500.

And I went to founder, I just told him everything. It’s like, here’s how I screwed this up. Best offer I got was $2.75, but the firm wants board control. So if you’ll just do it without taking the control of the board, you guys can have it. And Peter just offered 300 instead of $2.75, which wasn’t as good as my 500, but he didn’t need to do that. I told him

Harry Stebbings33:07

he could have it at $2.75, and he offered 300. What’s been your biggest lesson from working with Peter? They’ve invested several times in you.

Ryan Petersen

Yeah, they have. Founders Fund led our A, our B, participated in the C or D and led our E. How much of the companies do they have? They probably I had to go look at the latest cap table. Probably like almost 15% or something, maybe 12. There’s been some dilution, so

Harry Stebbings

Okay.

Ryan Petersen

Any big lessons from Peter? Man, he’s sort of an enigma. Just amazing how far in the future he’s able to look and be right. The number of predictions that he’s made well out there just kind of blow your mind. That’s not unique insight for me, but that’s one of things that amazes me. Actually, of the things I love personally about Peter is that I feel like most people I talk to talk too slow. And Peter does not. And if you accelerate your speech with him, at least when Peter and I talk to each other, I think we talk like two times faster than when we talk to other people, and there’s never a moment where he’s, like, doesn’t

Harry Stebbings34:01

understand what I’m trying to say. I care a lot about word to value ratio. You know the people who take a very long time to say quite a simple message, and you’re like, just say the fucking thing. Drives me crazy. Yeah. Should you always take the highest price?

Ryan Petersen

When fundraising?

Harry Stebbings

Yeah.

Ryan Petersen

No. Maybe. It depends. That was the worst. I hate fluff when people don’t get into it. Should you? No. Maybe. It depends. I’m trying to think, like, over the years, I kind of would always just take the highest price. Brian

Harry Stebbings

Chesky says, don’t ever take the highest price. Don’t ever.

Ryan Petersen

That I disagree with. It could be quite uncorrelated, like the best brand name investor could pay more than the second best sometimes. It’s very hard to give generic fundraising advice. I think it’s very dangerous. Like, each if a founder asks me for advice, I’m like, you know your situation much better than I do. So it’s like, you have to be careful on that.

Harry Stebbings

No. I I disagree totally. And with the greatest of respect, actually think there is generic advice, which you should listen to Sure. Which is like tier ones are worth it. Take a discount. Yeah. They will help you get a next round unwaveringly.

Ryan Petersen35:01

Yeah. That’s the next thing I was gonna say is like with that caveat, you probably will get a bet. Like, the fact that we’re a founders fund company has made so many other investors want to invest in Flexport and like You

Harry Stebbings

consistently underestimate how team members think about VCs and the importance of VCs to joining a company as a decision. The amount of great operators who you’re like, well, they wouldn’t be, I don’t mean this rudely, dumb or naive enough to just join a company because of a VC. Do just join a company because of a VC. They’ll go, oh, it’s a Sequoia backed company. Oh, it’s a founder’s found back company. It must be hot.

Ryan Petersen

Yeah. Well, and employees have the hardest time because they only get to pick one at a time. Right? Like, one company. I don’t

Harry Stebbings

know. Silicon Valley right now. You hop around. Why don’t I say one at a time? Do you find that hard? The hopping that seems so prevalent today more than ever? It seems like there’s a lack of loyalty. For sure. And

Ryan Petersen

we basically moved away from San Francisco as a result. Like, our team in San Francisco is maybe 4% of the company’s based in San Francisco, even though that’s where we’re founded and where I’m based. Why is that?

Harry Stebbings36:00

Is that because of cost or loyalty?

Ryan Petersen

Cost and loyalty.

Harry Stebbings

Retention of good people has always been really hard. And the acquisition, respectfully, you’re fighting against OpenAI, Anthropic, and some of the hottest companies on the planet. As great a business as you are, you’re not as sexy.

Ryan Petersen

Yeah. And like our customers aren’t there. So I don’t need a big sales team in San Francisco. You know, we need to be everywhere, not just in San Francisco. So I think we maybe overdid it though. Like five years ago, had 800 people in San Francisco. And right now we’re down to about 75. And actually, I’m looking around being like, my leadership team is too distributed. I want more talent in San Francisco. So I’m probably gonna start pushing more of our employees like, hey. You should come move back to San Francisco.

I just got our CFO to move to San Francisco. It’s made the business much better. Leadership

Harry Stebbings

team distributed. You said remote work is what? Dot dot dot. Can you help me fill in the statement here?

Ryan Petersen

Well, I got I say I say it’s white collar fraud. I have a three year old and a five year old. The idea that I could do any work at my house is like a total fantasy. Like, come on. You kidding? And, like, I have a bigger house than most employees do. Like, I actually do have a private office I close the door on. It doesn’t matter. Like, there’s no work getting done at that house when the children are around. And the kids come home, like, when does school end?

Three p. M? Like, your workday needs to keep going. So I think I’m highly against it. But we’re five day a week in office as the baseline assumption at our company. And I made the mistake during COVID of going remote and letting it stay remote for way too long. And so I think our culture suffered as a result. Was it difficult to bring it back in? Difficult for the people who don’t work here anymore.

Harry Stebbings37:38

But a lot of founders are sitting in the seat today going, man, I wanna bring it back. I want in person. I know the value of in person, but I don’t revolt when I say I’m sorry. What advice would you have to them?

Ryan Petersen

Yeah. I was just you gotta do what you wanna do. I mean, I think that all the bad things that have happened at Flexport were when I didn’t do what I wanted to do and was trying to was I you don’t wanna ever be afraid of your employees, first of all. The employees don’t want that either. They want a leader who’s going to go in the direction that they believe in. Even if they disagree, they want to follow a good leader. And if they opt out, that’s fine.

They can opt out. There’s a lot of good jobs. Think that also the idea that work from home is going to benefit highly paid employees is sort of a total fantasy. Work from home done correctly, you should be hiring the world’s greatest geniuses. There should be a labor arbitrage here where you’re finding really, really smart people who make a lot less money because of the way that our economy is structured, where some countries just have a lower purchasing power. And you can hire people like my brother has an assistant who has like off the charts IQ in The Philippines and makes like $500 a month or something.

I don’t know what he’s paying the person out, but like that’s who’s going to benefit from a work from home environment. It’s not the guy who’s making $2.50 ks a year and lives in Jackson Hole and wants to go skiing for four hours a day. Like that is there’s too much of that. Also, like, company like, look, your podcast is better if we’re in person. Sure. Way better. It’s the exact same with every meeting that you have. I struggle. And we struggle because we’re still even even if we’re in office, we’re distributed.

We have 40 offices. We need to be in every country. So I struggle personally, and my team all knows this. I struggle with paying attention in, like, video meetings.

Harry Stebbings39:15

I don’t actually really do Zooms anymore because I just, a, find that the quality of interaction is so low Yeah. And b, find that I’m so disengaged. I know, it’s bad, it’s

Ryan Petersen

bad. Like it’s the nature of our business. So I do want more of our talent to come back to us. Google has this new product, haven’t used it yet. They built this like, I think HP is marketing it for them called the Dimension. Oh, the holograms. People have used it, It’s amazing. I

Harry Stebbings

quite like the sound of this.

Ryan Petersen

But they’re like $250,000 each, then you need one. You can afford it. No. But I need one in every office.

Harry Stebbings

Well, how many offices do you have?

Ryan Petersen

40. 40? Growing. Yeah. Oh, yeah.

Harry Stebbings

You can’t afford it.

Ryan Petersen

It gets a little crazy. Right? That’s a lot. And we need to have an office in every country on earth. So and then that’s only one person at a time.

Harry Stebbings

I do wanna ask you just going back to the execs. You said before that we should touch on why you should never hire. I think it was that you should never hire execs, was it? Most startup founders. Yes. Yeah. And I just consistently see I saw this the other day with this founder. I just it’s one of the a really fast growing company. And they hired the CMO from one of these big logoed companies. And I go to the CMO’s Twitter. They don’t have Twitter. CMO doesn’t have Twitter.

That’s the And it’s most like the most enterprise CMO ever. And I’m just like, ugh. Marketing is the hardest thing to hire for too. Marketing and HR. Well, pause. Why is marketing and HR the hardest to hire for?

Ryan Petersen40:30

For different reasons. Marketing and enterprise marketing, the moment something works, it stops working because the competitors will copy it. And so it’s like, it’s all about creativity and originality. And like, how do you get creativity and originality in B2B enterprise marketing? And if you are creative, like, you probably kind of become a founder if you can do good storytelling and creative ideation in the marketing storytelling angle. So if you find a good marketer in B2B, you really want to lock them in. So it’s been a that’s a hard one to hire for.

And also, to do that, to do like successful B2B marketing and stand out. Like, it’s one thing, oh, I just make good sales decks for the team and like, okay, fine. Like, that’s some baseline stuff, but you’re not going to differentiate or move bend the curve on a company’s success. You have to be doing kind of crazy stuff. Most crazy ideas are bad ideas. So you’re it’s like being an investor. Like, you wanna do crazy things that happen to also be good ideas. Like, it’s that narrow intersection.

Which also don’t denigrate enterprise brand, which is even harder. Yes. And, like, as an employee, as a it’s so hard to take that risk because you’re like, I don’t know. If I do something crazy and it blows up, I get fired. Why take the risk? So it’s very, very hard to find a marketer that’s not part of the founding team or somehow you have to give, as a founder, you’re if not the one coming up with these crazy ideas and trying things, like you have to protect the team and let them, you know, the leaders there and let them know, like, I want you to experiment.

Because if it’s not crazy, it won’t work, or it has to be very expensive. And most startups can’t afford that. So it’s the big benefit that like a big brand has, is they can just do really expensive stuff. It’s expensive as a feature in enterprise marketing, because it’s like you wouldn’t spend a lot of money on something, promoting something if it wasn’t good, so it must be good. What’s the most expensive thing you’ve done marketing wise?

Harry Stebbings42:20

Well, we don’t have money to waste on marketing. But you’ve never spent like a million dollars on big logos, big brand?

Ryan Petersen

No. I mean, a million dollars, sure. We do, like, a conference that costs maybe a little bit more than that, customer conference. Do you find them effective? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. For sure. Events, like, events works all day. And by the way, don’t have be that crazy to do events. B2B marketing is events marketing to some extent. And, like, that’s, like, plain vanilla. But by the way, don’t need to go hire a CMO to run events. Like, conferences are kind of hard to pull off. But, like, normal events, like, hey, host a dinner.

Like, you don’t need marketing at all. Like Yeah. Yeah. Just have

Harry Stebbings

your sales guy call the people and give them a budget for it. So I basically was doing, I was prepping for a show with Adam from AppLovin. He’s like, Oh, I fucking hate HR and every great CEO hates HR. And like a complete dick that I am, I thought I’d front run his show and take every great CEO hates HR, and I’d tweet it myself. Oh my god. I got killed by everyone for this tweet, which was essentially Adam’s words, which I agree with, and I think he’s right.

And credit to Adam, he’s amazing. Do you agree every great CEO hates HR?

Ryan Petersen43:24

You probably go through these phases, right? I mean, I think the thing that you cannot have is them being like union representatives of your employees. They’re not. They’re there to represent the company, and therefore the CEO. And so if there’s, if you don’t have that as a CEO, like a trusted HR leader, and you feel like the HR leader is more on the side of the employees than on the side of the company, then there’s a problem. There have been periods in my company’s history and like the industry in general, where you’re like, didn’t have the right HR leadership that wasn’t focused on the business outcome.

But the employees are the company, and the company is the employee. Everything else is a fiction. We’re just like just a fake brand name here with a bunch of people that are building the company or serving the customer. So the the word HR is kind of wrong because they’re not humans are not a resource that you can mine and take out of the earth. Like, you have to give back to the employees and have a two way relationship.

Harry Stebbings44:14

They’re not, but agents are resources. Sure. That you mine, and agents will in large part replace humans. And so the the really interesting job function that could be created is like agent resources. That is a good idea. Honestly, yeah. It’s like nine nine six is being replaced by zero zero seven, which is, you know, midnight to midday, seven days a week, which is your new agent timeline. Do you buy the SaaS apocalypse? And what I mean by that is you said earlier that you’ve built agents for a lot of workflows.

Have you ripped and replaced Salesforce, Cooper, you name it, and built your own SaaS tools?

Ryan Petersen

Some. Not those names in particular. But, yeah, some. And I think the negotiation that we’re going to have with Salesforce should be a lot different than the last one. Because I think selling SaaS to tech companies is going be a tough business because we can build stuff ourselves. And Salesforce Salesforce is great, although most of our people don’t like Salesforce. How much do spend on Salesforce here? A few million. A few million? Yeah. It’s expensive. Yeah. So it’s on it’s on the list of candidates for that.

Harry Stebbings45:13

I just did a show with I don’t know if you know this guy. Fascinating guy, loved him. Built a business, a health insurance business in San Francisco. So $5,000,000,000 of COVID test kits during COVID. Oh, wow. And then obviously COVID no longer such a problem. And now he’s pivoted into a health insurance business that does north of 1,000,000,000 in revenue. Amazing, amazing guy. And they spent 600 k a year in Salesforce, and he replaced it with an inbuilt tool that took three weeks.

Ryan Petersen

Yeah. Yeah. So I suspect that we’ll be replacing a lot of these things. And and I think a lot of what’ll happen is you’ll just shake them down. I don’t know about Salesforce. Salesforce Slack is also gonna be a great turn out to be a great acquisition because, like, that’s pretty sticky. Nobody wants to replace build their own Slack. I could see a situation where you go, hey, we’re cutting Salesforce, they just raise their rates on Slack.

Harry Stebbings

I don’t know. So I we actually incubated a company which is Slack A competitor? Yeah. It’s a direct Slack competitor built for the AI age. Okay. Yeah. And it’s kind of actually predicated on a kind of idea of Alex Rampell from Andreessen. He says he wanna be in markets which is greenfield bingo, which essentially are markets where there’s a huge amount of net new customers created every single year. In other words, you don’t wanna exist in markets where there’s static market entrants. And actually, our market is every new startup that’s ever created.

If you’re creating a company, do you wanna go on to, like, Slack and Salesforce, do you want to have an amazing That AI first makes sense. Which I thought was interesting.

Ryan Petersen46:34

Yeah. Definitely want to be in big markets too. But I mean, I think, coming back to our earlier thing about SaaS, I think there’s going to be a lot categories where you say, for example, there’s one or two pieces of software that we fully replace and killed it, more every few weeks. But there’s going be a big category where you take like, one of the things I’m having our procurement team doing is make the PowerPoint case study of the one of the SaaS that we did replace and how we did it and how long it took.

And then just go down the list of all the other SaaS vendors that we have and say, hey, look, this is what we did because the vendor didn’t reduce our rates. So I need you to reduce your contract rates or else I’m just gonna have to vibeco, you know, replace you guys. And Question one, what is that reduction, do you think? I think you get,

Harry Stebbings47:16

like, 20% out of almost everybody. Okay. We’ll see that. We’ll see. No. No. I think that’s I think that’s very fair, actually. Do you worry about maintenance? Yep.

Ryan Petersen

That’s why I don’t want to have to do it for a lot. In some cases, it might be a bluff. I couldn’t do it for all of them. Like, and I don’t want to dedicate that much of our engineering resources to replacing SaaS. Like, I want to replace work, like expensive labor, and I want to build our product to make it way better. So I don’t I wanna, like, focus on our core business with our engineering talent and, like, not Do you worry about security? Yeah.

Constantly. Paranoid. Almost all of our competitors have had major hacks in logistics. Like, it’s been a major target area for cyber, and there’s been a lot of, like, ransoms.

Harry Stebbings

I’m not going into personal finances, but I didn’t know before we walked in the park about the angel investing. If you’re comfortable sharing, what have been some of the best angel checks?

Ryan Petersen48:04

Yeah. I’ve done really well as an angel investor. I I used to do a ton of it, early days of Flexport. So I I started this company called importgenius.com that throws off a lot of cash. It’s a nicely profitable business. So I actually started as an angel investor while I was in Y Combinator because I realized I I had inside access. I was kind of like a Was it

Harry Stebbings

really obvious who was great, and did your beliefs on who was great turn out to be correct?

Ryan Petersen

It wasn’t obvious who was great. It was obvious who was terrible, though. And I think if you could eliminate the bottom half, like, you’re doing pretty well inside of a YC bet. What was the bottom half doing that the top half? You just talk to the people and be like, I don’t know, a good person. And they didn’t see me as an investor, I’m their peers, I could get the real story. So I invested inside of my own badge. I invested in 13 of the 50 companies or something like that.

No. There was a few good outcomes there. Algolia, I was an investor in that. But I missed Cruise. Cruise was in my batch. You get

Unknown

out of Algolia?

Ryan Petersen

Yeah. I did. I sold my shares in Algolia a while ago. Well done. Fantastic. So I made money on that one. You missed Cruise? Yeah. And I’m friends with Kyle. Why? I don’t know. It’s just like it was too crazy. Like, he was just, like, throwing this camera setup on the roof of his Honda Civic or no. His I forgot what car he had, Acura or something. I was like, this is not legit. It’s not a thing.

Harry Stebbings49:14

It’s not legit. You know the crazier the thing, the more I’m like, I need to do that. Yeah. Because if I don’t get it, I’m probably missing something.

Ryan Petersen

Maybe. Yeah. So what are my best angel investments? I was well, actually Bitcoin, early Bitcoin. Sold that. Don’t don’t kidnap me. I don’t have any Bitcoin anymore. But I made money on Bitcoin. I was the first investor in Rippling. Put a big check into that. Did really well. Are you revengeful? No. I’m personally not. But I think that investing in founders who are have a who are pissed at somebody and, like, wanna get back at them, like, same with Rippling. It’s aria I never met before, but, yeah, I don’t know if he was wrong.

Rippling? Yeah. Parker? Parker, Zenefits, a a 16 z. They fired him. I never got that vibe whenever. Yeah.

Unknown

I’m just trying to get it.

Ryan Petersen50:01

Rippling. I think, actually, it’s a great I have a great thesis around, like, founders who have been wronged. Second time founders who feel like they were wronged the first time around would be, like, great investment thesis.

Harry Stebbings

Revenge and patriotism is a great investment thesis. Revenge and patriotism is a fantastic one. Do you have a chip on your shoulder? Not really.

Ryan Petersen

Yeah. I have a there’s a few people who I should be way more like, who have wronged me, but I, like, totally black them out and don’t care. I don’t know why. It

Harry Stebbings

might

Ryan Petersen

be better for What was the

Harry Stebbings

single best investor meeting that you had where they didn’t invest? Oh, none of them. I mean, those are None of them. There was never an investor meeting where, like, I don’t know. It was with, I’m just making up, Alfred Lin, and he was just super insightful and smart on the future of the industry, me, my business. And I was like, God, I’m just ashamed

Ryan Petersen

we

Harry Stebbings

didn’t get them.

Ryan Petersen

No. I’ve never had one of those. Really? I had a lot that seemed like they went well and then they never invested. The number of investors who ghosted me, by the way, after the pitch, the vast majority, I would say, where I pitched them, it seemed great. And then it’s just like never hear from them again. That would be the majority of investors I ever

Harry Stebbings51:05

This is where I like also the fact that know, I’m in the no bullshit camp. So I just say, I’m really sorry that we invested early. I just don’t didn’t didn’t believe that you were good enough. I’m I’m not gonna bullshit you and say that the market’s not good enough or big enough. Yeah. It’s all crap. But by the way, you’re giving any reason, you’re pretty unique. Most people just, like, just never say. No. But, you know, it’s it’s kind of rude and personal, but, like, I’d rather just be honest.

I just didn’t think you told a very compelling story and you were a bit dry. No. Mean, seriously It’s good. It’s good. You mind? But at least then you can take away, okay. Tell a more compelling story. Yeah. Fair. Which is always the case. Right? Yeah.

Ryan Petersen

PG, his advice to founders was always, you should hear the no, but ignore the why, because the odds of them telling the truth multiplied by the odds of them being correct are so low that you’re just like very little signal in what investors tell you about no. You should

Harry Stebbings

definitely hear the no, though. They pass. By the way, especially when they’re multistage funds, when there’s absolutely no reason for them to ever kill optionality, Like, I want you to think that I’m amazing because in case you do in flight, I want you to come back. Yeah. I wonder how

Ryan Petersen52:08

many founders out there are, like, actually secretly hate you because you tell them something that they didn’t wanna hear. It’s probably non zero.

Harry Stebbings

Like, honestly, a lot. Yeah. But I also think that they’re not the best founders. Yeah, yeah, who cares? But I think if I actually said to you, Dude, I actually liked you, I just didn’t think you told a very interesting story about the future of logistics that excited me, I think you’d probably go, I need to get better at telling stories. By the way, my

Ryan Petersen

overall experience with VCs have been incredibly positive. Yeah. Including those who’ve passed, have become friends and, like, people that I hang out with, and there’s no there’s no ill will at all, but have way more negative experiences than positive. Like, not to say that they weren’t positive experiences, but, like, I I think you said earlier you enjoy pitching investors. I like pitching, but I don’t like hearing no or getting ghosted or whatever. Have you ever had a terrible one where like they

Harry Stebbings

fell asleep or Yeah. No. I’ve had a customer fall asleep on

Ryan Petersen

me. Never an investor. That’s pretty Literally fell asleep, though.

Harry Stebbings53:00

I’m like, oh, shit. What’d you do? Did you wake them up?

Ryan Petersen

Like, throw throw throw a What did I do? It was, like, seven or eight years ago. The guy just fell asleep. They’re now we we ended up winning them over. There it was a sales pitch, so they weren’t a customer. Yeah. It was a prospect. I’m terrified of what the capacity is. Just The the worst one, I’ve only I let I walked out of one investor meeting, not, like, in a huff. I left my partner there, my co founder or, like, my the president of Flexport.

He stayed behind. And I said I had to take a phone call, and I just never came back. Why? They they kept telling me that the market size was too small, and it was like the third pitch. And, like, after this first two, I thought we’d overcome this. Like, we presented some we found some BCG market sizing report and, like, shared it with them. And it was like, And if you need BCG to convince them, just

Harry Stebbings

don’t bother. I know,

Ryan Petersen

100%. And it was like the third pitch, and I thought we were going to move to term sheet. And instead, they had brought their own report that showed how the market size was only for Flexport was only $6,000,000,000 And I was just like, actually, my partner had the best line. He was like, Oh, so it’s smaller than the market for USB cables. And it became obvious to me that these and I said, I don’t think in BCG reports. Like, it wasn’t me that got the BCG report.

Someone else did. I was like, Just look object for the rest of your day. I want you to, like, look around at everything that you see and just ask yourself, how did it get here? I’m like, that’s our market size.

Harry Stebbings54:25

Like, I don’t think in So I always say to founders, if you need to educate an ambassador on the market, they’re not the right investor for

Ryan Petersen

It’s tricky because if you’re doing something very unique

Harry Stebbings

and different or, like, in our case, like Do you think any of you your investors bet on you because of the market? I don’t think they did. I think they probably bet on you because you

Ryan Petersen

Maybe. Yeah. They mostly bet on me. They didn’t they had never invested in this market before. That’s for sure. Peter, you know what? I met Peter. Sam Altman introduced me to Peter. Sam was one of our earliest investors, and he invested me to Peter to get advice. It was a classic thing. Everyone loves his book, right? Zero to one is such a great book. And so Sam introduced me, and that book has six or seven, I can’t remember, think there’s like six questions to decide if you’ll change the world.

This is like an incredible startup that you should ask. And on five of the six questions, I felt like Flexport knocked it out of the park, best possible answer. But then one of them is, is it a small market? Because his whole thesis was, you should have a market that’s small enough that you can be a monopolist. And when I went to whiteboard with him and hang out with him, I’m like, well, I want to know, should I make myself like, I can make this a small market.

I’d be like, oh, we’re going to dominate logistics versus hardware companies in Silicon Valley or something, but it’s kind of fake. The market’s actually really big. And he stopped me, he’s like, Look, don’t be too dogmatic. It’s okay to have a big market. And then a few

Harry Stebbings55:48

weeks later, he emailed asking if he could invest. My biggest mistake is when I focused on market at all. All of my biggest mistakes investing have been actually not really, like, in losing money. It’s been turning down great companies. But because I thought that I was smarter than the market. Oh, this market shit. Oh, this market shit. How many angel investments have you

Ryan Petersen56:06

done? I I did so many, so, like, the vast majority didn’t do well. Like, 200? Yeah. Something like that. Wow.

Harry Stebbings

Do you track them? I have a Google Sheet in the Yeah. I know. I’ve just made 20.

Ryan Petersen

Well, I didn’t for a long time, but at some point, I had to clean it up when I was getting married and going through that exercise. What? Of doing, like, a will and Yeah. Exactly. Eventually, you wanna clean this up. Much better if you track it from the beginning. I would say probably it’s super power law world. And actually, this is an interesting thing for founders to understand is once you see the world from the perspective of the angel investor, you realize that we really don’t care.

Even a three x, like if you take my spreadsheet, and this investment made three times the money. Like, the founder is very proud, like, Hey, I made you three times your money. But if I remove that and make it a zero, it has zero impact on the bottom line of the fund, like zero relative impact on the IRR, because I have a couple that are 1000x or 500x, so they strictly, completely dominate everything else. So you don’t care, like, about the ones that failed. And when I write a check as an angel investor, I would just mark it to zero.

I don’t care. I just assume that it’s a zero. And then that way, I don’t worry if it fails. What

Harry Stebbings57:09

do you think founders don’t know about the VC mindset that they should do? I think that’s really valuable, because I I also see and this actually does pay me, which is, like, a really noble founder mindset, which is I’m gonna give five to ten more years of my life to grind out a one and a half x. And I’m just like, don’t. And I don’t mean that callously or flipping in. I’m not flipping with VCLP money, but just your time and my time.

Ryan Petersen

Yeah. Yeah. I don’t even want the investor updates. It’s fine, dude.

Harry Stebbings

Yeah. Like, it’s okay. Like, return 0.6 x is better.

Ryan Petersen

Yeah. I mean, if it’s your life’s mission and you’re calling, then, like, great. Never give up. Never there.

Harry Stebbings

To, like, investors.

Ryan Petersen

There’s that there’s what I was saying earlier of, like, how much they’re a circular rumor mill. You know, like, when I was doing one of the rounds of funding we were doing, and I was pitching this investor, and I think I was on, like, the third meeting. I’m not one of these people who like, Oh, you never talk to associates. Maybe I should be, but I think it’s kind of a loser way to live your life. I never had this attitude, like, shouldn’t ever talk to the junior people, mostly because I’m not a dick, but also I just assume that those people someday will become, like, partners, and they’ll remember that I was cool.

I don’t know. But I was, like, on the third meeting with this fund, and I was still talking to the not the junior person, but I wasn’t at the final decision maker yet. And so I told the guy, I was like, Hey, I’ve decided to go in a different direction here. This isn’t going to work out, and I’m going to raise you know. And within an hour, I got phone calls from like three other funds, who I hadn’t picked a different investor. I just was like trying to let this guy off the hook.

And within an hour, got all the funds that I was still talking to called me like, hey, what happened? I heard you picked a lead. And like the amount of rumor mill and collusion that happens in VC, founders have no idea. It’s like this create and you can use it to your can work against you or can you use it to your advantage. You’re looking for an outlier who will value you more than everybody else. So that collusion does not work to your advantage unless they’re all hyping you up and saying, Dude, this is the best company ever.

Harry Stebbings59:00

This is so not in my interest at all, but that’s why I always say to founders, Don’t test the market. Don’t dip your toe in with one or two meetings because the associate WhatsApp groups are so pernicious, where if you meet me and I don’t think you’re great, I promise you they put you in the weekly roundup, which they send out because they’re exchanging currency. Yeah. They need to give to get. Yeah, exactly. And so I’m putting you in my weekly update where I say, Ryan, only at a million error, not growing that fast, not a compelling sales rep.

And these are within a firm or these are cross firm? They’re cross firm. It’s

Ryan Petersen

crazy. Yeah, exactly. That’s what I was getting at before. Because

Harry Stebbings

we’re all associates and we’re all in the I need to bring deals to the firm business. And so they all send weekly roundups of who they’ve met and seen. That’s crazy that they’re sharing that externally. Oh shit, yeah. Their firms probably don’t know, right? No, no, But remember, this is almost a good article actually, but the associates are more in business with that class than they are that firm. Well, and they’re trying to get ahead within the firm and by showing that That’s it. They don’t bring dumb deals because they’ve referenced it.

My competition is not the other associate at x firm, it’s the other associates in my firm. And so if I can get ahead It’s like the f one driver’s side. Which is why the perniciousness is actually very real. Mhmm. Because then do you know what the others go? Oh, well, Ryan’s only at 1,000,000 there or not interesting either. Don’t need to meet him. That I do I I see that.

Ryan Petersen60:21

Well, and I also think founders should basically never share their metrics, which I’ve done on the show, so I don’t care anymore. But you should never share your metrics. No offense to your kind of past. I don’t need to raise any money ever again. But the you should never share your metrics because what you want to do when you pitch a VC is you want to cherry pick whatever metric looks the best and pitch that as the important metric for your firm. But once you’ve shared a metric, you’re now committed to that being the metric.

And who knows? Maybe you couldn’t make that one go up hockey stick style, but

Harry Stebbings

now you you’re you’re committed. I I remember Colin Mathilde. I think it was Colin. I think it was from do you know? Colin Front, French founder, YC partner now, I believe. Awesome woman. And she always told me that you wanna raise when you’re really confident just because, like, confidence emanates. Oh, yeah. When were you least confident, Raise?

Ryan Petersen61:08

Least? Yeah. Oh god. When you’re losing a lot of money, Flexport said. We we’ve been on the hero’s journey. Right? If anything is straight up into the right, by the way, is pretty boring. Not as an investment, great. It’s wonderful. But, like,

Harry Stebbings

as a human story, It’s that’s pretty hard to see any company. I I’ve tried to think about this before. Snap was pretty up and to the right continuously. I mean, IPO, it’s been Right. Up and down, but it was pretty continuously linear up and to the right. Not many others have been.

Ryan Petersen

But I don’t even mean as investor. As investment, of course, you want things to just go up into the right and never come down. But as a story of, like, what’s compelling to the human like, Snap story will be infinitely more compelling if they figure it out and start growing and going like hockey stick again than it would be if it never stopped and it was hockey stick. You’d be like, wow, what happened here? Like, that the human brain loves the story, the hero’s journey where you gotta go to hell and come back.

Like, if it’s just always good, like, that’s not fun. So we

Harry Stebbings

social media posts, the absolute banger is the zero to error. I started in my bedroom with no dollars, and now I’m sitting here with Ryan Petersen. Even

Ryan Petersen62:05

zero to hero is not good enough. You wanna go zero to hero and then take a fall and come back. So we need to cancel you and then the comeback. It’s different, a little bit different in enterprise because you have competitors. So, like, in our case, if we have a negative news story, like, literally no one will read it. And our we don’t have scandals. It’s just like, oh, such and such. Like, I once had a Bloomberg article about us where we lost a package for a customer, one single parcel.

I remember this. It was one parcel. It was quite a scandal. And it was a newspaper. I mean, Bloomberg’s not a print, but it was front lead of the story that Flexport, we used DoorDash to do the delivery. One parcel. By the way, the story did not mention we delivered 40,000,000 parcels successfully, but we lost one and we gave her a full refund before the story ever came out. And that became a scandal of sorts. Nobody would care. Nobody would read it, except we have competitors.

And the competitors will take your bad news and send it to your customers and stuff. So it actually can hurt in enterprise, it can hurt your business, negative news stories, even though it’s not the story itself. It’s like your competitors are kind of low life looking for dirt. One in 40,000,000. So, I probably mean, lost more than one, but the story was about one. You dig. And and actually, it’s an interesting story that we use DoorDash for logistics. People don’t think about that. But if you DoorDash has a bit of a problem there because DoorDash’s quality is better than others, or it’s as good as, like, a FedEx or UPS.

But when you use FedEx and the package doesn’t get delivered, people are like, yeah, it happens. It’s FedEx. But when you use DoorDash and it doesn’t get delivered, they’re like, why did you use DoorDash? Like, what’s wrong with you, company? Like DoorDash is for food delivery. Why did you it’s something they have to overcome because their quality is

Harry Stebbings63:39

actually

Ryan Petersen

fine.

Harry Stebbings

I think Tony Robbins said this once, but it’s like how fast appreciation turns into expectation is extraordinary. And it’s like before, you’re like, Hey, we didn’t expect to have Wi Fi on the flight, but now we’ve got Starlink. I need Starlink. And you’re like, wow, that’s amazing. Yeah. And then you get expectant of Starlink, and then the down is so bad. What did be a massive appreciation, now you’re like, I fucking expect this. Yeah. Which entrepreneur do you most want to have a dinner with that you haven’t had a dinner with?

Ryan Petersen64:10

Never meet your heroes. I’ve met most of the great founders. Do believe

Harry Stebbings

to never meet your heroes? Yeah. They well I don’t I don’t buy that analogy. I’ve I’ve met some of mine, they are heroic. Yeah. Yeah. Maybe I’m still idealistic.

Ryan Petersen

Depends. You know, also, you wanna meet people who are, like, at your level or see you as a peer and wanna actually engage in a dialogue with you. If you’re meeting somebody and they’re, like, unhappy to be at dinner with you, they don’t care about you and don’t ask you questions or learn from

Harry Stebbings

the more amazing the people, the more interested they are. I’ve been fortunate enough to have, like, you know, a sit down with Charlie Munger. Yeah. He was so curious. Oh, really? Yeah. Yeah. I I one of my dearest mentors would never want to be named down here, but he’s, like, one of the founding fathers of one of the greatest firms.

Ryan Petersen

He’s so curious. Yeah. Yeah. Some some of them are like this and some are. I I find it somewhat uncorrelated. Like, certainly, they were like that on the way up. Some people get to the top and then stop being curious, and then they’re you know, probably their returns or their impact after that will slow down is my theory.

Unknown65:05

But

Ryan Petersen

you beat some people

Harry Stebbings

on the absolute top who don’t care. Final two for you, and they they are more personal, but I have to say it for me to ask, but it’s general wisdom for me moving forwards. When When you think about winning but also winning at marriage, any tips on how to continuously have a great marriage? And dude, you’ve been through some rocky patches in terms of the business. How to sustain marriage through fucking hard ups and downs?

Ryan Petersen

Well, it’s a picking game, I guess, and you only get one bet. Right? So make sure you get the right one. My wife is a when I met her, she was a journalist, actually, at Bloomberg. And I still could have killed that Bloomberg story even though these were her peers that she worked with for years. I mean, it was crazy even then. But That was a risky move. I know. Yeah. Fuck. I didn’t talk to journalists. It was. It was a bit in fact, someone one of my investors at Founders Fund told me, dude, you need to either marry this woman or break up with her, but you cannot be dating her.

No. He’s right. Great advice. So I married her. And then she had to quit, in part because of me, because she got assigned to cover SoftBank, who’s my investor. And I was like, No. Can’t do it. Sorry. And she she knew that she it was not a good fit. What’s it been like having SoftBank? I love Masay.

Harry Stebbings66:19

But I do they how did you pitch Masay?

Ryan Petersen

Yeah. Yeah. Of course. How was it? I love him. He’s just like a big larger than life. Was it in person? Yeah. Yeah. I think definitely in person. I’m trying to remember if I also met him first on video. No. It was in person. Can you just take me to this? I

Harry Stebbings

love Masay. I love gambling. I just love the guy. How was this? Where was this?

Ryan Petersen

I mean, I don’t I can’t say I, like, love him that much interpersonally. We’re not friends or anything, but I’m just a big fan of Masayoshi Son, right? Where did you meet? How did it go? I met first time I met him would have been at his house in Woodside, California, which is like it’s very nice, let’s say. You can look up the zest imate. You’re like, oh, this is gonna be fun. The Zillow estimate. How long was the meeting? Probably, like, actually pretty short, maybe an hour or so.

Considering the size of the check, I thought it was surprisingly short meeting. He has this painting of Napoleon behind him, and I wanted I didn’t end up finding one. I was trying to buy a painting of the the Duke of Wellington to send it to him. Right? Who, of course, defeated Napoleon, but as a troll, but I never found a good one that it was worthy of the of the prank. It’s a bold move as well. Oh, yeah.

Harry Stebbings67:21

It’s a risky one. Just leave it. Well, only

Ryan Petersen

after he invested, I was gonna send him that as a gift. He he’s very bold. You know? I I don’t I he wanted me he pushed us to go, hey. Be cheaper than everybody because we raised a billion dollars from them. So

Harry Stebbings

Raised a billion from them?

Ryan Petersen

Yeah. Well, they led the round of billion. Yeah. And he was like, whatever the price of freight is, you just be 10% cheaper than everybody. And then if someone matches you, you just be 10% cheaper than that, which is like a terrible strategy. I did not do that. We would have burned so much money. But he was very aggressive. Just wanted to push you to go bigger.

Harry Stebbings

Mental elasticity there. It’s different to most investors.

Ryan Petersen

And he’s very connected too. Like, he was able during the meeting to call, like, Foxconn, get him on the phone, be like, hey. What do think of this thing? Like

Harry Stebbings68:04

What? In the meeting? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Like, live. Are you serious?

Ryan Petersen

Well, he had this guy next to him call. I’m like or WhatsApp. I forgot. I think it was a This must be the weirdest

Harry Stebbings

thing. Like, due diligence in process. Like, what do think? And you’re like, oh, shit. Do I like, thumbs up, thumbs down. You do not wanna fuck up. You must have been nervous.

Ryan Petersen

I was I don’t remember. I don’t get nervous on that kind of thing.

Harry Stebbings

When have you been most nervous in the Flexport time?

Ryan Petersen

I get nervous when I have to give a talk publicly, and it’s very time bound, because I’m, like, kind of long winded. I don’t and then I don’t I can’t memorize anything. So I don’t prepare like, I usually will just go speak off the cuff, and I’m a good public speaker, basically a good public speaker, but I I can’t, like, memorize. So, like, actually, my the most nervous I ever was was the Y Combinator pitch because I only had two minutes.

Harry Stebbings

I find TV most nerve racking because it’s like you have, like, five to seven minutes, and they’re like, so, Ryan, let’s join you for is Trump wrong on and you’re like, no. No intros. No in house. They don’t wanna help you out. Like And they don’t wanna help you out, and they just want the seven minute I’m gonna get you. I’ve gotten pretty good at TV, I think. I’m like Do you think you having a big personal brand matters to the enterprise value of Flexport? Yeah.

Ryan Petersen69:13

Do. As measured by when I tell my sales team I’m gonna do less of it, they always push me to go do more press. Like, they say that it helps them get deals and close deals and stuff. But it’s it’s one these things. I think it was Steve Martin who said, like, he went on The Tonight Show. He went on every late night show that would have him. And then he would go around West Hollywood, walk around Hollywood, and nobody would recognize him. Like, is in the early days.

And then, you know, so you couldn’t tell, like, if it was having an impact. And then after, like, five years of that, he was, like, the most famous comedian in America. Everybody knew him. He couldn’t go anywhere, but he couldn’t pinpoint it to, like, any one thing. So it’s been a bit of my I only learned that recently. That wasn’t, like, driving me to go try to do more press or anything. But, generally, I think being famous has helped Flexport a lot. And we’re way more famous than, like, we should be given that we’re, like, the tenth largest freight company.

I couldn’t name many of them. Yeah. Exactly. I mean, you you could, like, expedite no. You don’t know some of them. Maersk is, like, a famous company. I know Maersk. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. They’re a monster. They’re big. Yeah. They’re a lot bigger than us. But I I probably I think Flexport gets more we’re more likely to be cited in the press on a story about supply chain than they are despite them being much bigger.

Harry Stebbings70:20

Final one, then we’ll do a quick fire. You mentioned two kids, five and three year old. Any big lessons on parenting? I love kids. It’s really important that I’m a good dad. You just sit me down, imagine I’m your younger bro. Dude, you should know this.

Ryan Petersen

Well, you need to have a great wife, who’s a great mom, so you have a good partnership. The kids will be pretty natural. You’ve got millions of years of evolution. It’ll be great. Great to finally care about someone besides yourself. Chemical wash of just, like, true love that is you can’t get it anywhere else. So Does it change perspectives? For sure. Yeah. But, like, I get a lot of meaning from my work. Truly, like, I just genuinely love what I do. It’s a real mission for me.

My life’s work is building Flexport. But a lot of people don’t have that. And I was always, like, kind of confused because, like, most people I meet don’t have a sense of purpose about their work like I do. And I’m like, how do these people function? Like, I don’t know. How do you get through life? You notice as soon as you have kids, like, you will get I get more purpose from that than I could from Flexport. And so that’s the vast majority of human beings should get their purpose from their family, from their life.

I was

Harry Stebbings71:25

incredibly lucky. I watched The Social Network, and I saw Peter Thiel invest in Facebook, and that’s how I ever found out about venture capital Really? When I was 13. And I always lived in London. Venture capital is not a thing. And so that was how I found out. Movie? Yeah. Cool. And I’ve only ever wanted to be a VC. And, like, this is my whole life and being. And I always feel terribly sorry for people, but especially young people who, like, don’t know what they want to do with that life.

Ryan Petersen

Yeah. They should just have kids, and then they’ll be solved. That will be solved. That problem will be solved instantly. But if if you get a lot of purpose from your work, then you can have the opposite problem of, like,

Harry Stebbings

oh, like, you still got you gotta be a great dad. Wanna I do a quick Friday because I could talk to you all day. So what have you changed your mind on most in the last twelve months?

Ryan Petersen72:03

For the last decade, I didn’t wanna compete on price, and I wanted to be the premium provider in logistics and thought it would be bad to compete on price. And now I’m, like, pretty convinced that we need to be the low cost leader and just go so hard at lowering our costs that if you’re cheaper, you just take all the market. And I think I was maybe lying to myself because it was too hard to automate the work and too hard to become the low cost provider and are we’re smaller than some of the big peers, so they buy freight cheaper than us and stuff.

And I think I was lying to myself and it’s like, no. You need to be the cost leader, and we have to figure out everything we can to be the cost leader. Masayoshi like, was like, just sell under your cost.

Harry Stebbings

Like, I don’t believe in Who do you not have on your board that you’d most like to have on your board? Magic Wand.

Ryan Petersen

I don’t think our Flexport’s board needs anybody. The board is, like, mostly there to represent the interests of our the investors and make sure we’re doing a good job, not, like Okay. But

Harry Stebbings

whose wise counsel would you like to have? Do you wanna join the board? Is that what you’re angling? I mean, listen. I think I’d add a lot to the board personally, but I it needs to be your decision, ultimately.

Ryan Petersen73:06

I’m just glad that my board doesn’t screw with us. My board has been, like, very supportive of us, of me in particular. I don’t really want a more active board. They’re not super active in the business. They’re not, like, telling us what to do. They don’t help that much, but they don’t ever hurt. And, like, I would much rather have that than, like, a really helpful board. I don’t think there’s a risk of the board firing me. Someone who’s really smart and thinks they’re smarter than me might fire me.

Harry Stebbings

Penultimate one. What sports team do you not sponsor that you would most like to sponsor?

Ryan Petersen

Oh, I really would love to sponsor this football club in Hamburg called Saint Paulie. Why? They’re the second team in Hamburg. And the first team my great grandfather was a sailor from Hamburg, first of all, so I’ve got, like, a personal history there. I don’t know if that team was around back then, but the first team is owned by Klaus Michael Kuhne, who’s the owner of our direct competitor, Kuhne Nagel. And I just love the idea that we would take the second team and beat him, and he would be like, oh, those kids.

These damn kids. Here they come again. So just more of a troll than anything else. And their logo is a pirate. They’re like I don’t know their logo, but they’re kinda like they’re like kind of like a leftist communist oriented club. I think they would kinda hate us if we tried to buy.

Unknown74:21

Yeah.

Harry Stebbings

Maybe. Maybe. Yeah. I didn’t know that. Because they wouldn’t be that expensive, but if they totally. Also, sports is a tough business to Yeah. I don’t wanna own any teams. Final one. What has to happen in 2026 for you to consider it a successful year?

Ryan Petersen

We got to hit our numbers. We got grow like crazy. Then this automation via AI, like, we we we’ve got about probably, like, a 100 core workflows that are costly that we’re building AI agents for right now. And, like, five of them are live and working and saving us money and 95 that are under development. And I need I need at least, like, 80% of those to come to life and, like, actually have the impact. Otherwise, we’re just spending money

Harry Stebbings

and not getting much back for the AI. Dude, it’s been so great to have you person. Thank you so much for doing it also on a Sunday of all time. So I really appreciate it, dude, and it’s really special to meet you in person properly. Yeah. It’s great to be here. But before we leave you today,

· Sponsor read0 min · 595 words
Harry Stebbings75:13

meet Ava, the first autonomous AI BDR built by Artisan to run your entire outbound on autopilot.

Unknown

Hey, Jason. I’m from SaaStr here. Artisan is s tier. We’ve replaced our entire outbound sales team with Artisan. I believe we’ve sent over 50,000 highly customized emails to Artisan. The open rate is twice what it was with humans, and they close 100 k deals day after day.

Harry Stebbings

Eva sources leads from over 250,000,000 contacts, enriches every prospect with intense signals, then writes and sends personalized multichannel outreach, self optimizing over time. When a lead replies, she handles objections and books meetings straight into your AE’s calendars without any human input. Artisan is backed by Y Combinator and has raised $36,000,000 to build the first truly autonomous AI BDR? Hire Ava, the AI BDR, and get $300 in credits when you sign up at artisan.co/20vc. That’s artisan.co/20vc. While artisan scales your outbound motion, granola turns every call into clean notes.

When I’m not recording the world’s greatest freaking podcast, I’m probably in meetings. Pitch meetings, board meetings, LP meetings, I can’t get enough of them. When all the meetings are over, I look at my notes and they make no sense to me. Illegible scribbles. That’s why I use Granola. Granola is the AI notepad for people in back to back meetings. I say back to back because it makes me feel busy and special. So I jot down rough notes like many do, and in the background, granola transcribes and turns them into really clear useful notes immediately after the meeting ends.

And I’ve been using granola for months, and my favorite feature is chatting to my notes. No one else will chat to me these days. And I can ask it anything, and it trills through every meeting I’ve ever had and finds the answer. What was the valuation of the startup that pitched me last week? Who on my team said they would share the memo? And even coaching and tips, like how can I ask founders better questions when they’re pitching me? All the best operators I know use Granola to help them get more done.

So if you’re in a lot of meetings, trust me, this is a really good tool for you. It takes seconds to set up, connects to your calendar, works on any meeting platform, head over to granola.ai/20vc, and get three months free with the code 20VC. That’s granola.ai/20vc with the code 20VC. That’s 20V C. Once granola turns the conversation into clear notes, Finn turns that clarity into better customer support. As AI agents become more common in customer experience, teams often end up juggling multiple silo tools for every job.

Well, Finn was built to change that. It’s a single unified agent that works across your entire customer experience from service to sales to success and beyond. Fin is the agent making perfect customer experiences possible for thousands of customers. It’s powered by custom models, trained on years of real customer interactions, so it understands the nuance and complexity of customer service better than any other agent. That means faster resolutions, more consistent support, and just better experiences for every customer. It’s also designed to be fully self manageable, so you can easily improve and adapt it as your business evolves.

No third parties required. Leading companies like Gamma, Asana, DoorDash, and crypto.com already use and love Fin to deliver better customer experiences. So for a limited time, you can get $500 a month in Fin credits for your first three months. Learn more at fin.ai/20vc.

↑ Top