How transparent should leaders be with their own organizations?
7 recorded positions from 6 people, first said Mar 10, 2017. They do not agree — the readings below are what each one actually argued.
Near full transparency enables scaling without organizational breakdown
Miki Kuusi · Nov 28, 2022
CEOs should operate with full transparency toward co-founders, management and board rather than shielding the team from what worries them
Protecting the team makes you a single point of failure and burns you out, prevents the team from working with full information, and the team produces smarter solutions than you would alone
Scope: transparency directed at co-founders, management and the board
25:14 20VC: Wolt CEO, Miki Kuusi on Leadership Lessons Scaling to a Reported $8.1BN Exit to Doordash, Building Teams not Families, The Difference Between Trust and Safety Within Companies, How To Use Compensation to Create Culture & Why You Should Not Be Lookin
Emad Mostaque · May 17, 2023
People are the most important thing in a scaling organisation and everyone must be on the same page; closing up and building silos was a mistake that caused internal pain
Stability built silos it is now having to break down and is moving toward being more open
62:16 20VC: Why the AI Bubble Will Be Bigger Than The Dot Com Bubble, Why AI Will Have a Bigger Impact Than COVID, Why No Models Used Today Will Be Used in a Year, Why All Models are Biased and How AI Kills Traditional Media with Emad Mostaque, Founder & CEO @
Arthur Mensch · Apr 29, 2024
Transparent feedback and operating in an almost fully transparent manner is very useful and has let Mistral grow without breaking
He had untested management premises and found in practice that near-full transparency supported growth without the organization breaking
Scope: based on Mistral's own experience
43:41 20VC: Mistral's Arthur Mensch: Are Foundation Models Commoditising | How Do We Solve the Problem of Compute | Is There Value in the Application Layer | Open vs Closed: Who Wins and Mistral's Position
Also on the record
Stephane Kurgan · Jul 28, 2023
Giving every employee access to the company data warehouse is worth the cost of making the entire company insiders and restricting their trading to open windows
It signals you trust employees as adults to be responsible with data, which drives engagement; the alternative is prioritizing employees' ability to trade any day of the week
14:40 Full data warehouse access for employees is worth the cost of restricting trading windows
Stephane Kurgan · Jul 28, 2023
Radical transparency is incredibly powerful — a public compensation grid removes negotiation entirely, and near-total information sharing produces extremely high trust, engagement and shipping efficiency
Employees who know nearly everything trust the company more, which makes it efficient; and transparent comp grids leave no room for drawn-out, tense negotiation
20:47 Public comp grids and near total information sharing produce trust and shipping efficiency
Sam Corcos · Dec 11, 2023
Radical transparency is viable in companies in a way it isn't in countries because you can select and remove the people who behave politically
Full transparency collapses if everyone is political and distrustful, but unlike a country a company chooses its members — if a performance review reveals politicking you can fire that person
21:13 Transparency works in companies not countries since companies can select and remove political members
Andy Rachleff · Mar 10, 2017
Transparency must be paired with context, otherwise people invent their own context and usually assume bad faith or the worst outcome
If you let someone else set the agenda, transparency works against you
17:15 Transparency only works when paired with context
Your assistant can query this graph directly — 7 positions here, 19,646 across the corpus. Add 996.fm over MCP.