Is the traditional ten-year venture fund life long enough for today's company-building timelines?
7 recorded positions from 6 people, first said Aug 3, 2020. They do not agree — the readings below are what each one actually argued.
Market lacks permanent or decade plus capital vehicles for purpose driven founders
Daniel Ek · Mar 8, 2021
Prima Materia's core difference from venture capital is having no timeline — targeting impact in twenty or thirty years rather than five or ten
Removing funding-cycle pressure means questions like 'is this viable in two or three years for my next round or MVP' are discarded in favour of whether the right problem is being solved
Scope: structured as a holding company, not a fund
29:11 20VC: Spotify Founder Daniel Ek on Optimising Decision-Making, Structuring Effective Learning Processes, The Trials and Tribulations in The Transition From Founder To CEO & The Future of Building Prima Materia with Shakil Khan
Davis Smith · Dec 15, 2023 · hedged
His fundraise failed largely because he was too ambitious in trying to restructure governance to shift power from investors to the company's foundation, and because too few investors will commit to a ten-year horizon
Protecting the brand's purpose and mission required removing investor power over decisions, but almost no investors will stick with something for ten years, and the market timing was very hard
Scope: offered as a combination of factors; he says 'I don't know'; also cites hard public markets
25:04 20VC: Cotopaxi: From Selling $6M of Pool Tables to Scaling $150M in Revenues and Challenging Patagonia, Fundraising Lessons from 100+ Rejections & What Founders Do Not Understand About VC with Davis Smith, Founder @ Cotopaxi
Davis Smith · Dec 15, 2023
The venture market is missing fund structures with ten- to fifteen-year or permanent capital commitments that founders like him need
He wanted permanent capital and couldn't find it despite the business growing 50% in the twelve months since, which would have made it a great investment; almost all capital is short-term minded
Scope: based only on his own experience in the last twelve months
29:16 20VC: Cotopaxi: From Selling $6M of Pool Tables to Scaling $150M in Revenues and Challenging Patagonia, Fundraising Lessons from 100+ Rejections & What Founders Do Not Understand About VC with Davis Smith, Founder @ Cotopaxi
Deep tech timelines of ten to fifteen years exceed standard fund life
Steve Jurvetson · Aug 3, 2020
Fund structures do need to change for frontier, society-scale investing — a fifteen-year fund is more appropriate than the standard ten.
He has sat on successful companies' boards for fifteen to twenty years, and every fund he's been involved with ran to fifteen to seventeen years anyway; none were done at ten.
Scope: specific to deep-tech/frontier investing
25:48 20VC: Steve Jurvetson on 20 Years of Friendship with Elon Musk, How To Analyse Market Timing, Why Venture Does Not Scale & Why He Has Never Sold A Share in Any Company He Holds
Taavet Hinrikus · Apr 28, 2025
A ten-year fund life is too short for the companies being backed today — deep tech takes ten to twelve years, and fifteen if markets turn bad — and the industry needs to recognize this.
Wise itself took roughly a ten-year journey from 2010 to its 2021 listing, though the last three years were effectively liquid; deep tech runs longer still.
Scope: deep tech specifically
18:09 20VC: VCs are Spreadsheet Monkeys and are Commoditised | Why Fees and Carry Misalign GPs and LPs | Why Founders Will Realise Multi-Stage Funds Damage Seed Rounds | Why We Need European Sovereignty More Than Ever with Taavet Hinrikus
Also on the record
Cem Sertoglu · Nov 20, 2024
A ten-year fund life is too short for seed and early-stage funds, though the deadline is also healthy pressure on GPs to think about liquidity
He knows of no early-stage VC fund that was liquid by year ten, yet the year-ten mark usefully forces GPs to plan for liquidity even when everyone tacitly expects an extension
48:43 Ten year fund life is too short for seed and early stage funds but provides useful liquidity discipline
Zachary Bookman · Dec 6, 2024
Venture-scale companies take fifteen to twenty years to mature, not the five to ten people assume, which means venture funds take fifteen to twenty years to return capital to LPs
As an LP he is still waiting on distributions from legitimate funds, and the underlying companies simply take that long
0:00 Venture scale companies take fifteen to twenty years so funds need that long to return capital
Your assistant can query this graph directly — 7 positions here, 19,646 across the corpus. Add 996.fm over MCP.