Once a startup finds something that works, should it aggressively increase spend and burn to capture the market faster?
6 recorded positions from 5 people, first said Nov 28, 2022. They do not agree — the readings below are what each one actually argued.
Go all in immediately once something works more spend would have won more
Harry Stebbings · Nov 28, 2022
Momentum is transient — it comes and goes — so when you have it you must double down and ride it
You see momentum move in and out, especially across press cycles; having it is the moment to turn up the speed
50:45 20VC: Wolt CEO, Miki Kuusi on Leadership Lessons Scaling to a Reported $8.1BN Exit to Doordash, Building Teams not Families, The Difference Between Trust and Safety Within Companies, How To Use Compensation to Create Culture & Why You Should Not Be Lookin
Ilir Sela · Aug 4, 2023
With hindsight, the under-spending he most regrets was on go-to-market and product, because the slow salesperson ramp and having a single engineer for five years badly delayed reaching real scale
Sales headcount could only grow out of profits, so scale took five years, and one person doing all product and engineering capped what could be built
Scope: specific to Slice's pre-funding period
14:59 20VC: Why "Hire Great People and Get Out of the Way" is Total BS, Why Your Upbringing Can Make You a Worse Leader & A Bentley, Two Nissan Cubes and Becoming One of Macedonia's Largest Employers; The Story of Slice with Ilir Sela
Daniel Khachab · Oct 28, 2024
Once you have something that works you should go all in — he wishes Choco had doubled spend and tripled burn in its first twenty-four months
Something actually working is very rare, and more spend would have won a land grab on distributors and, more importantly, built a much larger brand in the industry
54:23 20VC: Why SaaS is Dead | Why AI First Companies Will Win | We are in the Middle of a Cold War for AI Talent | Why Europe is F******* and We Need to Stop Whining with Daniel Khachab, Co-Founder @ Choco
Only triple burn once pmf and good unit economics both proven then move fast
Frank Rotman · Aug 11, 2023
Capital should only be added when a business is generating proof; when it is generating anti-proof, more capital is usually the wrong answer
Momentum is real and compounds when things are going right, so capital can be an accelerant then; but if the doubling was harder or more expensive than projected, that is anti-proof of the business
30:47 20VC Roundtable: NEW FORMAT: Why the Seed Investing Model is Broken, How to Make Money at Seed Moving Forward; Who Wins and Who Loses, Why Venture Value Add Platforms are BS and Failed and Why There Will be an IPO per Week in H2 2024
Aman Narang · Aug 21, 2024
Recognizing when you cannot yet put the pedal down — and stopping selling — is critical, even when you are trying to raise capital and grow
Toast had multiple starts and stops because the product didn't work well enough; a restaurant owner told him it's great to have the Tesla but not when it's always in the shop
11:39 20VC: Five Lessons Scaling Toast to $14BN Market Cap | The Biggest Mistakes Founders Make in Fundraising, Hiring and Selling with Aman Narang, CEO @ Toast
Daniel Khachab · Oct 28, 2024
You should only triple burn once the complete package works — product-market fit plus a go-to-market with good economics — and then move as fast as possible
That is the point at which you attract copycats, so speed matters; and spending must stay within the constraints of good economics and capital efficiency
Scope: rejects the framing as either/or between raising to compete and ignoring the frenzy; must also account for the competitive situation
55:28 20VC: Why SaaS is Dead | Why AI First Companies Will Win | We are in the Middle of a Cold War for AI Talent | Why Europe is F******* and We Need to Stop Whining with Daniel Khachab, Co-Founder @ Choco
Your assistant can query this graph directly — 6 positions here, 19,646 across the corpus. Add 996.fm over MCP.